Hi,
In the interest of completing the mail archive:
I've uncovered the cause of my trouble last month. It turns out that
the linker searches the directories listed in /etc/ld.so.conf when
looking for shared objects. Somehow, that file got changed to mode
600. Since I couldn't read the file, t
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:40:13PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:49:41PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Steve M. Robbins writes:
> >>
> >> > I expect that one cannot do so in general. But I'll take a partial
"Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:49:41PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Steve M. Robbins writes:
>>
>> > I expect that one cannot do so in general. But I'll take a partial
>> > solution, if there is one. On linux, at least, "ldd libfoo.so" will
>>
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:49:41PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Unfortunately it's hardly possible to automatically detect dependencies
> that have not been declared anywhere by a means other than trying out all
> possible candidates.
While we're on the subject, what about this situation:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:49:41PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Steve M. Robbins writes:
>
> > I expect that one cannot do so in general. But I'll take a partial
> > solution, if there is one. On linux, at least, "ldd libfoo.so" will
> > tell me which other shared objects libfoo links again
Steve M. Robbins writes:
> I expect that one cannot do so in general. But I'll take a partial
> solution, if there is one. On linux, at least, "ldd libfoo.so" will
> tell me which other shared objects libfoo links against, so this
> info is embedded in the shared object.
If the info is embedde
Hi,
When I use AC_CHECK_LIB(foo,bla), it will fail utterly if libfoo
is linked to libbar and I neglected to put "-lbar" in the 5th
argument of AC_CHECK_LIB.
This may be just what you want.
On the other hand, I get the impression that every time I turn around
X11R6 has split out another two or t
