Hello!
It isn't guaranteed that the user has -lkse, and you don't check for it.
Well that check is inside a check for FreeBSD, and if it doesn't have
pthread then it should have kse. Or am I missing something?
Your script will not be really robust, because you are making such
assumptions.
Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I use things like this:
>
> AC_CHECK_FUNC(gethostent, , AC_CHECK_LIB(nsl, gethostent, , , -lsocket))
> AC_CHECK_FUNC(openlog, ,
> AC_CHECK_LIB(gen, openlog, ,
> AC_CHECK_LIB(syslog, openlog, , , -lsocket)))
Always quote nested macro calls. Actually,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:25:47PM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
several comments:
1) AC_MSG_ERROR is better than "echo"
2) you should use LIBS, not LDFLAGS for -l flags
3) in the example you show, one call to AC_SEARCH_LIBS might be better.
(But I
I use things like this:
AC_CHECK_FUNC(gethostent, , AC_CHECK_LIB(nsl, gethostent, , , -lsocket))
AC_CHECK_FUNC(openlog, ,
AC_CHECK_LIB(gen, openlog, ,
AC_CHECK_LIB(syslog, openlog, , , -lsocket)))
in case that's useful to anybody...
H
___
Autocon
Hello Stepan,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:25:47PM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> several comments:
> 1) AC_MSG_ERROR is better than "echo"
> 2) you should use LIBS, not LDFLAGS for -l flags
> 3) in the example you show, one call to AC_SEARCH_LIBS might be better.
>(But I don't know your real code
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 04:53:58PM +0200, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:
> AC_CHECK_LIB(lib1, func, [LDFLAGS=-llib1], [])
>
> if [ -z "$LDFLAGS" ]; then
> AC_CHECK_LIB(lib2, func, [LDFLAGS=-llib2], [
> echo "$0: Need lib1 or lib2" >&2
> exit 2
> ])
> fi
several comments
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Trying -lpthread, if not available, trying -lkse?
I'd try to get the ACX_PTHREAD macro from the autoconf archive and
work with that. Any of its shortcomings should be discussed with
its maintainer (or on this list, FWIW) and incorporated into an
I
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:56:12PM +0100, Simon Morgan wrote:
> On 8/23/05, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd try to get the ACX_PTHREAD macro from the autoconf archive and
> > work with that. Any of its shortcomings should be discussed with
> > its maintainer (or on this list, FW
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:56:12PM +0100, Simon Morgan wrote:
> AC_CHECK_LIB(pthread,pthread_create,THREAD_LIBS="-lpthread",THREAD_LIBS="-lkse")
>
> which "seems to work". Can you or anybody else with more experience
> than me see any problems with it?
It isn't guaranteed that the user has -lkse,
On 8/23/05, Baurzhan Ismagulov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It isn't guaranteed that the user has -lkse, and you don't check for it.
Well that check is inside a check for FreeBSD, and if it doesn't have
pthread then it should have kse. Or am I missing something?
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:36:57PM +0100, Simon Morgan wrote:
> On 8/23/05, Baurzhan Ismagulov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Trying -lpthread, if not available, trying -lkse?
>
> That sounds like a better idea than simply checking the
> OS version but unfortunately I have no idea how to implement
On 8/23/05, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd try to get the ACX_PTHREAD macro from the autoconf archive and
> work with that. Any of its shortcomings should be discussed with
> its maintainer (or on this list, FWIW) and incorporated into an
> improved version of the macro. That wa
Hi Simon, Baurzhan,
* Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote on Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 04:21:11PM CEST:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 11:47:21AM +0100, Simon Morgan wrote:
> > Versions of FreeBSD >= 5.3 no longer link with -lkse and require
> > -lpthread instead.
>
> Trying -lpthread, if not available, trying -lkse?
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:36:57PM +0100, Simon Morgan wrote:
> On 8/23/05, Baurzhan Ismagulov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Trying -lpthread, if not available, trying -lkse?
>
> That sounds like a better idea than simply checking the
> OS version but unfortunately I have no idea how to i
On 8/23/05, Baurzhan Ismagulov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trying -lpthread, if not available, trying -lkse?
That sounds like a better idea than simply checking the
OS version but unfortunately I have no idea how to implement
such a test. Any suggestions?
___
Hello Simon.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 11:47:21AM +0100, Simon Morgan wrote:
> Versions of FreeBSD >= 5.3 no longer link with -lkse and require
> -lpthread instead.
Trying -lpthread, if not available, trying -lkse?
With kind regards,
Baurzhan.
___
Auto
Hi,
Versions of FreeBSD >= 5.3 no longer link with -lkse and require
-lpthread instead. I'm trying to add a check to an autoconf
configure.in file to set THREAD_LIBS based on the version of FreeBSD
the program is being compiled under. The program is using a case
switch to check $host.
I've done a
17 matches
Mail list logo
