> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> On Jan 25, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Should we (i) make sure not to use config.site in the test suite,
>> or (ii) have this test grep out this message?
Alexandre> (ii)
Since now the `loading conf
Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> Should we (i) make sure not to use config.site in the test suite, or
> (ii) have this test grep out this message?
I vote for not using an installed config.site, because the test
suite should be self-contained and a config.site test within the
testsuite should be based on
On Jan 25, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should we (i) make sure not to use config.site in the test suite, or
> (ii) have this test grep out this message?
(ii)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer ao
> Should we (i) make sure not to use config.site in the test suite, or
> (ii) have this test grep out this message?
>
> It sounds good to have the test suite protected from the user, but
> OTOH, it sounds good to have a means to check configures using the end
> user's config.site.
I'd vote for (
| Hi,
Salut Nicolas!
| I just tried CVS autoconf on Tru64 unix v5.1 computer and noticed a
| failure of AC_CACHE_CHECK if an autoconf site file exists in default
| prefix location `/usr/local'. without this `config.site' defaults file
| all tests are successful.
|
| njoly@medusa [~]> cat /usr/
