Re: autoconf ^M vs echo+tr

2009-04-08 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-04-08 09:09, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Török, > > * Török Edwin wrote on Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 10:02:00PM CEST: >> Regenerating configure with version 2.63 gives me: >> -ac_cr=`echo X | tr X '\015'` >> +ac_cr='^M' >> >> I thought the echo + tr was more portable, and it also works bette

Re: autoconf ^M vs echo+tr

2009-04-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Török, * Török Edwin wrote on Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 10:02:00PM CEST: > Regenerating configure with version 2.63 gives me: > -ac_cr=`echo X | tr X '\015'` > +ac_cr='^M' > > I thought the echo + tr was more portable, and it also works better with > various tools that adjust newlines (like SVN

autoconf ^M vs echo+tr

2009-04-07 Thread Török Edwin
Hi, Regenerating configure with version 2.63 gives me: -ac_cr=`echo X | tr X '\015'` +ac_cr='^M' I thought the echo + tr was more portable, and it also works better with various tools that adjust newlines (like SVN with certain props set). With the configure that has ^M I can't even svn diff, be