| On 15 Jun 2001, Akim Demaille wrote:
| > But I can tell you the tests are much better now, so I think it
| > deserves this difference. Have a look at config.log too. The point
| > is really to let the maintainer find everything she needs in there.
| > And BTW, if you lack some information in
On 15 Jun 2001, Akim Demaille wrote:
> But I can tell you the tests are much better now, so I think it
> deserves this difference. Have a look at config.log too. The point
> is really to let the maintainer find everything she needs in there.
> And BTW, if you lack some information in it, ask fo
| Hi,
| My general impressions after 1 day of autoconf 2.50 use.
|
| - The backtrace facility is really a nice feature.
Cool :)
| - "config.status much faster on most architectures"
| but configure is slower. Here are the timings of gettext's configure:
|
| autoconf 2.13: 23.0 sec rea
Hi,
My general impressions after 1 day of autoconf 2.50 use.
- The backtrace facility is really a nice feature.
- "config.status much faster on most architectures"
but configure is slower. Here are the timings of gettext's configure:
autoconf 2.13: 23.0 sec real 14.2 sec user
aut
