On Mon, 2 May 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Now, if you configure a package and forget to add
> --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu
> or maybe use the setarch tool to set personality (I do not even know how
> portable/available this is -- it exists in RedHat Fedora),[...]
It appears to be specific to Red
On Sat, 7 May 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Sorry for the long response delay. And thank you everyone for providing
> useful information.
Sorry too, for not popping into this discussion earlier.
> * Noah Misch wrote on Tue, May 03, 2005 at 03:57:07AM CEST:
> > On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:31:57AM
Hi Noah, others,
Sorry for the long response delay. And thank you everyone for providing
useful information.
* Noah Misch wrote on Tue, May 03, 2005 at 03:57:07AM CEST:
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:31:57AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I have a question regarding systems with more than one A
* Bob Proulx:
> 2. User installs amd64 (aka x86-64) kernel. /usr/bin/ is x86 but can
>now run amd64 binaries too. So now the userland is a multiarch
>userland.
It's also possible to run an AMD64 kernel, but do not install any
AMD64 libraries. Technically, the system might be able to ru
* Ralf Wildenhues:
> or maybe use the setarch tool to set personality (I do not even know how
> portable/available this is -- it exists in RedHat Fedora), it may break,
> e.g. because of the __x86_64__ preprocessor define.
This is a bug. Debian only defines __x86_64__ when -m64 is given on
the c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
> Actually, that is one of the possibilities. And in that case I would
> deny that it is a completely x86 userland.
>
> 1. User installs x86 kernel. x86 userland. Everything 32-bit. I
>think this would be considered the "normal" installation.
>
> 2. U
On Tue, 03 May 2005, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >> I have a question regarding systems with more than one ABI,
> >> specifically x86_64. If you consider for example the Debian
> >> distribution which has a x86_64 kernel, but a co
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I have a question regarding systems with more than one ABI, specifically
> x86_64. If you consider for example the Debian distribution which has a
> x86_64 kernel, but a completely x86 userland,
Actually, that is one of the possibilities. And in that case I would
deny th
Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> I have a question regarding systems with more than one ABI,
>> specifically x86_64. If you consider for example the Debian
>> distribution which has a x86_64 kernel, but a completely x86 userland,
>> config.guess still gives yo
Retry - The first posting doesn't seem to have made it.
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 10:31 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I have a question regarding systems with more than one ABI, specifically
> x86_64. If you consider for example the Debian distribution which has a
> x86_64 kernel, but a completely
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 10:31 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I have a question regarding systems with more than one ABI, specifically
> x86_64. If you consider for example the Debian distribution which has a
> x86_64 kernel, but a completely x86 userland, config.guess still gives
> you x86_64-unkno
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I have a question regarding systems with more than one ABI, specifically
> x86_64. If you consider for example the Debian distribution which has a
> x86_64 kernel, but a completely x86 userland, config.guess still gives
> you x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu as output. (I have be
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:31:57AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I have a question regarding systems with more than one ABI, specifically
> x86_64. If you consider for example the Debian distribution which has a
> x86_64 kernel, but a completely x86 userland, config.guess still gives
> you x86_6
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:31:57AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I have a question regarding systems with more than one ABI, specifically
> x86_64. If you consider for example the Debian distribution which has a
> x86_64 kernel, but a completely x86 userland, config.guess still gives
> you x86_6
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Should I rather ask this on the config-patches list or elsewhere?
Yes, that's the right place to ask it.
Personally I would prefer having config.guess default to whatever the
compiler does (defaulting to plain "cc" or "gcc", I guess). That's
the mos
15 matches
Mail list logo
