Re: wierd problem

2005-01-25 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Jonas Geiregat wrote on Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:09:21PM CET: > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:04:53 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I actually forgot that its name is --add-missing (short: -a). > > This option is documented. > > But no man page ? Well, this depends, actually.

Re: wierd problem

2005-01-25 Thread Jonas Geiregat
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:04:53 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I actually forgot that its name is --add-missing (short: -a). > This option is documented. But no man page ? I forgot to mention an other question when running aclocal I get alot of warnings, what does this mean ? /us

Re: wierd problem

2005-01-25 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Jonas Geiregat wrote on Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 07:54:59PM CET: > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:29:45 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Try running > > automake --add > > once. > > I already fixed it with automake -af > But thanks anyway, also the --add option isn't in automake

Re: wierd problem

2005-01-25 Thread Jonas Geiregat
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:29:45 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try running > automake --add > once. I already fixed it with automake -af But thanks anyway, also the --add option isn't in automake --help nor is there a automake man page ?! is this normal ? ___

Re: wierd problem

2005-01-25 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Jonas Geiregat wrote on Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:50:15PM CET: > > So the gcc ... are in fact parameters to the depcomp script. > > Try running the whole > > source='main.c' ... /bin/sh ./depcomp ... > > > > Does it create main.o? If notm try to debug the shell script. > Yes it does , the

Re: wierd problem

2005-01-25 Thread Jonas Geiregat
> So the gcc ... are in fact parameters to the depcomp script. > Try running the whole > source='main.c' ... /bin/sh ./depcomp ... > > Does it create main.o? If notm try to debug the shell script. Yes it does , there's no ./depcomp file ! ___

Re: wierd problem

2005-01-25 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hi, On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:15:37PM +0100, Jonas Geiregat wrote: > I have an other problem not really autoconf related more automake I > think but far from sure. I'd also day it's an automake problem, as the depcomp script is distributed with automake. Try going to automake@gnu.org, mentioning

Re: wierd problem

2005-01-25 Thread Jonas Geiregat
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:19:33 +0100, Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:18:30PM +0100, Jonas Geiregat wrote: > > I've tried the following code with autoconf version 2.13 and 2.59 > > please use 2.59, which is the current version. > > > AC_INIT ([main.c])

Re: wierd problem

2005-01-25 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hi, On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:18:30PM +0100, Jonas Geiregat wrote: > I've tried the following code with autoconf version 2.13 and 2.59 please use 2.59, which is the current version. > AC_INIT ([main.c]) ... > ./configure: line 523: main.c: command not found Use: AC_INIT([main.c]) (no space),