>>> I tend to work around these sorts of glitches using Gnulib; its
>>> stdint module fixes the portability problem with
>>> __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS that I know about. Admittedly Gnulib is not
>>> for everybody.
>>
>> Hehe. I use gnulib, so this is just fine for me.
>
> Will test `stdint' module so
>> I tend to work around these sorts of glitches using Gnulib; its
>> stdint module fixes the portability problem with
>> __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS that I know about. Admittedly Gnulib is not
>> for everybody.
>
> Hehe. I use gnulib, so this is just fine for me.
Will test `stdint' module soon – I've
>> Will this problem be handled in a forthcoming autoconf release?
>
> I'm afraid I don't understand the problem yet, as your original
> email defined __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS, but now you're saying that
> -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS fixes the problem.
Indeed, doing
./configure CC=g++ CPPFLAGS="-D__STDC
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Will this problem be handled in a forthcoming autoconf release?
I'm afraid I don't understand the problem yet, as your original email
defined __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS, but now you're saying that
-D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS fixes the problem. That being said, my guess is
that it's
>> Repeating your test verbatim I get the #error message!
>
> How about if you compile with the following command instead?
>
> g++ -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -c t.cc
>
> That fixes the problem on RHEL 6.4, anyway.
It works for me, too.
Will this problem be handled in a forthcoming autoconf release
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Repeating your test verbatim I get the #error message!
I'm not too surprised, since you're probably using a pre-C++11 system.
I get the same #error on RHEL 6.4, which uses g++ (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313
(Red Hat 4.4.7-3), which is older even than your compiler. How about if
Hello Paul!
>> neither `UINT64_MAX' nor `uint64_t' gets define
>
> That's odd, because UINT64_MAX is defined for me, even for this
> much-simpler program:
>
> #include
> #ifdef UINT64_MAX
> typedef uint64_t TA_ULongLong;
> #else
> # error "No unsigned 64bit wide data type found."
> #endif
>
>
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
neither `UINT64_MAX' nor `uint64_t' gets define
That's odd, because UINT64_MAX is defined for me, even for this
much-simpler program:
#include
#ifdef UINT64_MAX
typedef uint64_t TA_ULongLong;
#else
# error "No unsigned 64bit wide data type found."
#endif
If I put this
