On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
off topic : is it better to use ${have_ecore_con} or $have_ecore_con ?
It does not really matter, but the former is more robust.
That's contradictory (you should be able to explain it better).
For instanc
Andreas Schwab wrote, quoting Vincent Torri:
>> off topic : is it better to use ${have_ecore_con}
>> or $have_ecore_con ?
>
> It does not really matter, but ...
Depending on context, it might: $foobar is the same as ${foobar},
but not ${foo}bar. In any context, where you need to append text
to th
Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> off topic : is it better to use ${have_ecore_con} or $have_ecore_con ?
It does not really matter, but the former is more robust.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germa
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
That is, a new line is added. I don't know why. It is annoying as I am
doing the test on $3 (note that the third parameter is optional). What is
also strange is that I use that macro several times, and that
Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That is, a new line is added. I don't know why. It is annoying as I am
> doing the test on $3 (note that the third parameter is optional). What is
> also strange is that I use that macro several times, and that new line is
> only added when I call:
>
> A
