On 06/10/2013 03:41 AM, Gavin Smith wrote:
Do users of your library have to use what is declared in
; equivalently, do they have to include this
file to use your library? If not, there wouldn't be a problem - the
source for your library could include an alternative header file, but
it wouldn't ha
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Peter Johansson wrote:
> I maintain a library that uses boost heavily. Recently I learnt that
> is broken with certain version of GCC (4.4.7 for
> example). I would like provide a workaround for users of the library (myself
> e.g.) so we won't even notice the break
On 06/08/2013 01:35 AM, Daily, Jeff A wrote:
Peter,
I'm not an experienced boost user, but I am aware that much of boost is header-only
libraries. And it sounds like from your description above that your library installs
headers which also include this potentially broken
header. The communi
> -Original Message-
> From: autoconf-bounces+jeff.daily=pnl@gnu.org [mailto:autoconf-
> bounces+jeff.daily=pnl@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Peter Johansson
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 5:04 PM
> To: Autoconf Mailing List
> Subject: implement workaround for header files
>
> Hi autoconf
