Re: feedback on 2.69b

2020-07-27 Thread Zack Weinberg
FYI, these issues are now being tracked as https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?110285 (C++11 probe is too slow) and https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?110286 (need to be able to control which version of the language standard is selected). zw

Re: feedback on 2.69b

2020-07-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2020-07-24 16:31, Zack Weinberg wrote: checking for g++ option to enable C++11 features... none needed takes on the order of 10 seconds for some developers. And that is for one loop, since "none needed"; good luck if you need more than none. I suspect that this is because the test program

Re: feedback on 2.69b

2020-07-24 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020, Peter Eisentraut wrote: It looks like it's not easy to disable these tests even with low-level hackery. It would be better if there were still a way to set the preferred level of C and C++ in an official way. Wow! I am glad that you got here first. Particularly as app

Re: feedback on 2.69b

2020-07-24 Thread Zack Weinberg
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 9:53 AM Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Here is some feedback on applying the 2.69b beta on the PostgreSQL > source tree. Basically, everything worked fine. This is great news. Thank you for testing. > One issue we would like to point out is that the new scheme of > automat