Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh

2007-08-27 Thread Noah Misch
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:34:13PM +0400, Roman Rybalko wrote: > I invoked aclocal and expect it will respect ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in > Makefile.am - but it doesn't. > > So, as I can see, ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS works only for autoreconf (and some > other tools), but not to aclocal. > Is it correct ? Correct.

Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh

2007-08-27 Thread Roman Rybalko
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > If there is something you tried and it did not work as expected, then > please show what you did so we can try to reproduce it. > > Here it is: I invoked aclocal and expect it will respect ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in Makefile.am - but it doesn't. So, as I can see, ACLOCAL_AMFLAG

Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh

2007-08-27 Thread Andreas Schwab
Roman Rybalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > when I have to include some m4s in m4 dir how I can specify -I m4 option > to aclocal through autoreconf ? Set ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in the toplevel Makefile.am. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra

Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh

2007-08-27 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Roman Rybalko wrote on Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:00:23AM CEST: > > > aclocal will use the value of ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in your top-level > > Makefile.am, so you can do something like: > > ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I build-aux > Is it really works ? If there is something you tried and it did not work as expe

Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh

2007-08-27 Thread Roman Rybalko
> aclocal will use the value of ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in your top-level > Makefile.am, so you can do something like: > ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I build-aux Is it really works ? I tried this somewhen, but it wasn't working. Anybody, tell me plz the docs about this. I've red some docs, but don't found any info

Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh

2007-08-27 Thread Benoit SIGOURE
On Aug 27, 2007, at 9:44 AM, Roman Rybalko wrote: I've inherited an autotools-using project and am trying to learn more about autoconf and automake. The project has used the following brief autogen.sh: aclocal && autoheader && autoconf && automake --add-missing --copy Is there any reason I

Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh

2007-08-27 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Roman, * Roman Rybalko wrote on Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:44:36AM CEST: > when I have to include some m4s in m4 dir how I can specify -I m4 option > to aclocal through autoreconf ? Add the line ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I m to the toplevel Makefile.am. Cheers, Ralf

Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh

2007-08-27 Thread Roman Rybalko
when I have to include some m4s in m4 dir how I can specify -I m4 option to aclocal through autoreconf ? >> I've inherited an autotools-using project and am trying to learn more >> about >> autoconf and automake. The project has used the following brief >> autogen.sh: >> >> aclocal && autoheader &

Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh

2007-08-25 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello David, * David Bruce wrote on Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 02:33:21AM CEST: > > I've inherited an autotools-using project and am trying to learn more about > autoconf and automake. These may help for a general introduction:

Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh

2007-08-25 Thread Noah Misch
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 08:33:21PM -0400, David Bruce wrote: > I've inherited an autotools-using project and am trying to learn more about > autoconf and automake. The project has used the following brief autogen.sh: > > aclocal && autoheader && autoconf && automake --add-missing --copy > > Is

Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh

2007-08-25 Thread Benoit SIGOURE
On Aug 25, 2007, at 2:33 AM, David Bruce wrote: Hi, I've inherited an autotools-using project and am trying to learn more about autoconf and automake. The project has used the following brief autogen.sh: aclocal && autoheader && autoconf && automake --add-missing --copy Is there any rea