| > The problem was that Lars was AC_DEFINE($var), which unfortunately
| > is not extensible in 2.13. It is now, and autoheader, IMHO, achieves
| > that end for both the maintainer, *and* the end user. I personally
| > consider it is a requirement that all the #undef templates be
| > documented
> The problem was that Lars was AC_DEFINE($var), which unfortunately
> is not extensible in 2.13. It is now, and autoheader, IMHO, achieves
> that end for both the maintainer, *and* the end user. I personally
> consider it is a requirement that all the #undef templates be
> documented/described
> "T" == T E Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
T> the point would be to reduce effort (it appears that autoheader
T> doesn't achieve that end)
:P :)
The problem was that Lars was AC_DEFINE($var), which unfortunately
is not extensible in 2.13. It is now, and autoheader, IMHO, achieves
tha
> > Hm, I might be over picky, but I would have answered no. autoheader
> > 2.13 is including all the paragraphs which are related to something
> > which is AC_DEFINE'd, which is not necessarily all the content of
> > acconfig.h.
>
> What about AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED? And, shouldn't autoheader
> "Lars" == Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hm, I might be over picky, but I would have answered no.
>> autoheader 2.13 is including all the paragraphs which are related
>> to something which is AC_DEFINE'd, which is not necessarily all the
>> content of acconfig.h.
Lars> What a
> Hm, I might be over picky, but I would have answered no. autoheader
> 2.13 is including all the paragraphs which are related to something
> which is AC_DEFINE'd, which is not necessarily all the content of
> acconfig.h.
What about AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED? And, shouldn't autoheader check aclocal.m
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
One thing I can't seem to figure out: if acconfig.h exists, is
autoheader supposed to add all its contents to config.h.in?
Alexandre> Yup
>> Hm, I might be over picky, but I would have answered no.
>> autoheader 2.13 is
On Apr 25, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> On Apr 25, 2000, Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> One thing I can't seem to figure out: if acconfig.h exists, is
>>> autoheader supposed to add all its
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> On Apr 25, 2000, Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> One thing I can't seem to figure out: if acconfig.h exists, is
>> autoheader supposed to add all its contents to config.h.in?
Alexandre> Yup
Hm, I might be ove
Perhaps this is a stupid question, but did you remember to add the
following to the top of your configure.in file? I made a simmilar
mistake when writing my configure.in.
AC_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h)
Mo Dejong
Red Hat Inc.
On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> $ autoheader --version
> Au
On Apr 25, 2000, Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing I can't seem to figure out: if acconfig.h exists, is
> autoheader supposed to add all its contents to config.h.in?
Yup
> And if this doesn't happen, is there a way to find out why?
Run it with `sh -x'.
--
Alexandre Oliva
11 matches
Mail list logo
