OK, here is what I came up with. I'm not that experienced with m4 yet,
so I wonder if the more experienced amongst you can conceive of any reason
why the following ATTRIBUTE-LIST approach is bad? It has the advantage
of catching some problems at autoconf-time (instead of configure run-time)
and
| : 2.14.1 doesn't exist!
|
| It did for a short time. I assume you use the autoconf CVS repository.
Yep, sorry, I should have said no longer exists.
| : ifelse([$3], [],
| :[$3], [yes],
| :[$3], [no],
| :[AC_FATAL([$0: invalid attribute `$3'])])dnl
|
| I'm reading up
On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 04:29:29PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
: | On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 02:12:19PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
: | : It'd be much easier if you could send what you have, and how it fails.
: |
: | Well, since I figured out the problem but didn't know how to implement
: | "compil
| On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 02:12:19PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
| : It'd be much easier if you could send what you have, and how it fails.
|
| Well, since I figured out the problem but didn't know how to implement
| "compile-time" autoconf macros, I don't really have anything that fails...
| I'
On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 02:12:19PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
: It'd be much easier if you could send what you have, and how it fails.
Well, since I figured out the problem but didn't know how to implement
"compile-time" autoconf macros, I don't really have anything that fails...
I'm reading up
It'd be much easier if you could send what you have, and how it fails.
Akim
> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> SOME_TEST()=> --with-somethingsome test [default=yes]
Lars> SOME_TEST( , , nodefault ) => --with-somethingsome test [default=no]
Lars> I've tried some stuff but without any luck... What seems to be one of
Lars>
