Re: Ultrix problem

2001-01-12 Thread Akim Demaille
$ eval 'echo toto >/tmp/stdout 2>/tmp/stderr' >/tmp/outter illegal io $ Could you try this? eval '(echo toto >/tmp/stdout 2>/tmp/stderr)' >/tmp/outter

Re: Ultrix problem

2001-01-12 Thread Akim Demaille
$ eval 'echo toto >/tmp/stdout 2>/tmp/stderr' $ cat /tmp/stdout toto $ cat /tmp/stderr $ $ eval 'echo toto >/tmp/stdout 2>/tmp/stderr' >/tmp/outter illegal io $ Thanks Harlan!

Re: Ultrix problem

2001-01-11 Thread Harlan Stenn
$ eval 'echo toto >/tmp/stdout 2>/tmp/stderr' $ cat /tmp/stdout toto $ cat /tmp/stderr $ $ eval 'echo toto >/tmp/stdout 2>/tmp/stderr' >/tmp/outter illegal io $ Harlan > Could you try this? > > eval 'echo toto >/tmp/stdout 2>/tmp/stderr' > > and > > eval 'echo toto >/tmp/stdout 2>/tmp/stderr

Re: Ultrix problem

2001-01-11 Thread Akim Demaille
Could you try this? eval 'echo toto >/tmp/stdout 2>/tmp/stderr' and eval 'echo toto >/tmp/stdout 2>/tmp/stderr' >/tmp/outter ? Thanks!

Re: Ultrix problem

2001-01-11 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Harlan> checking whether build environment is sane... yes Harlan> /bin/sh: \272: not found Alexandre> What if you take the quotes off "$prog" ? Harlan> That seems to be the ticket! Warf warf warf! 272 = 200 (8th bit) + 72 (ascii

Re: Ultrix problem

2000-12-29 Thread Harlan Stenn
> What if you take the quotes off "$prog" ? That seems to be the ticket! I'm running the new script on a number of platforms just to be sure. H

Re: Ultrix problem

2000-12-29 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Dec 29, 2000, Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Still doesn't work, and should the second problem be forked into a thread > for autoconf while this one stays on automake? Yep, the latter is certainly a problem in autoconf. What if you take the quotes off "$prog" ? -- Alexandre Oliv

Re: Ultrix problem

2000-12-29 Thread Harlan Stenn
On that second problem, a fragment of config.log follows: ... configure:1867: checking whether gcc accepts -g configure:1885: gcc -c -g conftest.c >&5 configure:1888: $? = 0 configure:1899: result: yes configure:1924: checking how to run the C preprocessor configure:1948: gcc -E conftest

Re: Ultrix problem

2000-12-29 Thread Harlan Stenn
> > + eval ${SHELL} /pogo/users/stenn/src/ntp.001227/missing --run : > > I believe this can't be a problem in autoconf, since the `missing' > script is maintained as part of automake and, indeed, the test to > check whether it supports the `--run' switch relies upon `:'. > > Does missing work

Re: Ultrix problem

2000-12-29 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Dec 29, 2000, Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > + eval ${SHELL} /pogo/users/stenn/src/ntp.001227/missing --run : I believe this can't be a problem in autoconf, since the `missing' script is maintained as part of automake and, indeed, the test to check whether it supports the `--run'

Re: Ultrix problem

2000-12-28 Thread Harlan Stenn
While tracking down the apparent non-problem with OBJEXT I followed somebody's advice and ran the "configure" step under "sh -x", which produced the following output on the Ultrix box: ... MISSING=${SHELL} /pogo/users/stenn/src/ntp.001227/missing + eval ${SHELL} /pogo/users/stenn/src/ntp.00122

Re: Ultrix problem

2000-12-28 Thread Derek R. Price
Harlan Stenn wrote: > /bin/sh: : not found > WARNING: `:' is needed, and you do not seem to have it handy on your > system. You might have modified some files without having the > proper tools for further handling them. Check the `README' file, > it often tells you