Re: Serious breakage in CVS autoconf tree on case-insensitive filesystems

2001-08-09 Thread Tim Van Holder
> | > In fact, I realized that latter on, and changed that, but I suppose > | > the mere presence of Autoconf (now renamed Autom4te) on the CVS repo > | > | Actually, no you didn't - the problem is that it still has files in it > | (otherwise cvs update -dP would have pruned it). > > :-)=) > > Ahe

Re: Serious breakage in CVS autoconf tree on case-insensitive filesystems

2001-08-09 Thread Akim Demaille
| > In fact, I realized that latter on, and changed that, but I suppose | > the mere presence of Autoconf (now renamed Autom4te) on the CVS repo | | Actually, no you didn't - the problem is that it still has files in it | (otherwise cvs update -dP would have pruned it). | | $ cd lib | $ cvs upd

Re: Serious breakage in CVS autoconf tree on case-insensitive filesystems

2001-08-08 Thread Tim Van Holder
> In fact, I realized that latter on, and changed that, but I suppose > the mere presence of Autoconf (now renamed Autom4te) on the CVS repo Actually, no you didn't - the problem is that it still has files in it (otherwise cvs update -dP would have pruned it). $ cd lib $ cvs update -d Autoconf c

Re: Serious breakage in CVS autoconf tree on case-insensitive filesystems

2001-08-08 Thread akim
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 06:43:00PM +0200, Tim Van Holder wrote: > I should have noticed this earlier, but it's been a while > since I last updated the CVS tree. > I just updated it and ran into an annoying problem: there is both a > lib/Autoconf and a lib/autoconf directory. This is not possible o