Re: No, I *don't* HAVE_IO_H!

2000-10-30 Thread David Andrew Michael Noelle
> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:49:36 -0500 (EST) > From: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Try this and make sure that your results are the same: > $ cat >foo.c < > #include > > EOF > $ gcc -E foo.c >/dev/null > foo.c:1: foo.h: No such file or directory > $ echo $? > 1 Y

Re: No, I *don't* HAVE_IO_H!

2000-10-30 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello, David! > I find it highly interesting to note that that the first test for the > header succeeded, but the very next test configure performed, > to determine whether vfork() actually works, failed because > could not be found. Thank you for investigating this problem. The old versions

Re: No, I *don't* HAVE_IO_H!

2000-10-29 Thread David Andrew Michael Noelle
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 24 Oct 2000 01:28:58 -0200 > > On Oct 23, 2000, David Andrew Michael Noelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can anyone tell me what might cause this? > > A config.cache or config.site that i

Re: No, I *don't* HAVE_IO_H!

2000-10-24 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Oct 23, 2000, David Andrew Michael Noelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anyone tell me what might cause this? A config.cache or config.site that incorrectly sets cache variables. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer