> "Steven" == Steven G Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steven> On 17 Jul 2001, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> Here is what I mean. As soon as we agree on this, 2.51 will be
>> released. I hope people have been testing 2.50c hard...
Steven> Looks good to me.
Yahooo!!!
Well, 2.51 is on its tr
On 17 Jul 2001, Akim Demaille wrote:
> Here is what I mean. As soon as we agree on this, 2.51 will be
> released. I hope people have been testing 2.50c hard...
Looks good to me.
Steven
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steven> Suggestions?
Akim> I still propose what I suggested above: two actions, and a means
Akim> for the user to read the name of the dummy main, empty standing
Akim> for not needed.
Here is what I mean. As soon as we agree on this, 2.
> "Steven" == Steven G Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steven> On 12 Jul 2001, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> AC_F77_DUMMY_MAIN (action-if-fail, action-if-none, action-if-found)
>>
>> I have a problem at least with the order here. I'd prefer
>>
>> action-if-found, action-if-none, action-if-fa
On 12 Jul 2001, Akim Demaille wrote:
> AC_F77_DUMMY_MAIN (action-if-fail, action-if-none, action-if-found)
>
> I have a problem at least with the order here. I'd prefer
>
> action-if-found, action-if-none, action-if-fail
>
> and I would even prefer to have
>
> action-if-found
