Re: Failing of test 47: semantics.at:129 on HP-UX 10.20

2001-06-17 Thread Paul Eggert
> From: Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 17 Jun 2001 19:20:13 -0300 > > On Jun 11, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's very easy to set a guard against such compilers. But once we > > detected the compiler cannot evaluate such expressions, what do we do? > > Wo

Re: Failing of test 47: semantics.at:129 on HP-UX 10.20

2001-06-17 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Jun 11, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's very easy to set a guard against such compilers. But once we > detected the compiler cannot evaluate such expressions, what do we do? Would it work with a switch/case statement instead of an array declaration? In this case, we co

Re: Failing of test 47: semantics.at:129 on HP-UX 10.20

2001-06-11 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Peter" == Peter Ohlerich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter> Okay, here they are (I stopped the script as I saw that it went Peter> into a loop and always wrote the same things into the logs) Thanks! Peter, could you send some form of ID of this C compiler? People (autoconf@), we ar