On 17 Dec 2024, at 18:23, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> The other thing that comes to mind is, if there were anyone working
> seriously on usage of autoconf *without* automake, that would make
> the move a lot more valuable. I know some people have tried that in
> the past but I don't think any of them
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, at 12:24 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2024, at 17:17, Nick Bowler wrote:
>> Adding the automake list, because (mostly for historical reasons)
>> aclocal is actually part of automake, not autoconf.
>
> I’ve been using autotools for too many years and I _still_ forget wha
On 17 Dec 2024, at 17:17, Nick Bowler wrote:
> Adding the automake list, because (mostly for historical reasons)
> aclocal is actually part of automake, not autoconf.
I’ve been using autotools for too many years and I _still_ forget what tool is
where… Though considering what it does, it really
Hi Ross,
Adding the automake list, because (mostly for historical reasons)
aclocal is actually part of automake, not autoconf.
On 2024-12-17 11:01, Ross Burton wrote:
> I’m trying to clean up our autoconf invocation and want to do things
> the “right” way.
>
> We’re in a cross environment with s
