Re: autoconf suggestion

2011-02-16 Thread Eric Blake
[adding autoconf - I prefer discussions to be public rather than to just me] On 02/15/2011 11:19 PM, Robert Dell wrote: > Might I make a suggestion? > EVERY time I run the configure script, it checks for the same things, > over and over > checking for sys/types.h... yes > checking for sys/stat.h..

Re: Autoconf suggestion

2000-05-31 Thread Keith Bostic
>> I would also encourage putting the source for all test programs into the >> config.log file too, not just the failed ones. I don't know about other >> folks, but we use config.log for the sole purpose of debugging problems, >> and so the more information we can get in that file, the better off

Re: Autoconf suggestion

2000-05-31 Thread Steven G. Johnson
Keith Bostic wrote: > I'd like to make a small suggestion for autoconf -- it would be helpful > in debugging configuration problems if the output that is displayed on > the screen during configuration [...] were also copied into the >config.log output. That feature has already been incorporated i

Re: Autoconf suggestion

2000-05-31 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Keith Bostic writes: > I'd like to make a small suggestion for autoconf -- it would be > helpful in debugging configuration problems if the output that is > displayed on the screen during configuration were also copied into the > config.log output. This is already the case in the the development

Re: Autoconf suggestion

2000-05-31 Thread Mo DeJong
On Wed, 31 May 2000, Keith Bostic wrote: > I'd like to make a small suggestion for autoconf -- it would be helpful > in debugging configuration problems if the output that is displayed on > the screen during configuration: > > checking for gcc... cc > checking whether the C compiler (cc -O2