Re: AC_FUNC_GETLOADAVG

2002-06-14 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:43:38PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 04:53:10AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 11:19:17 +0100 > > > From: Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Why is that check there? > > > > So that your software distributio

Re: AC_FUNC_GETLOADAVG

2002-05-30 Thread Jim Meyering
Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 04:53:10AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: >> > Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 11:19:17 +0100 >> > From: Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > >> > Why is that check there? >> >> So that your software distribution is portable to hosts that do

Re: AC_FUNC_GETLOADAVG

2002-05-30 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 04:53:10AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > > Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 11:19:17 +0100 > > From: Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Why is that check there? > > So that your software distribution is portable to hosts that don't > have a working getloadavg. Oh.. this mean

Re: AC_FUNC_GETLOADAVG

2002-05-30 Thread Paul Eggert
> Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 11:19:17 +0100 > From: Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Why is that check there? So that your software distribution is portable to hosts that don't have a working getloadavg.

Re: AC_FUNC_GETLOADAVG

2002-05-30 Thread Patrick Welche
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 10:08:54PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > > From: Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 16:41:08 +0100 > > > > I'm afraid the new version of functions.m4 doesn't work for me > > (reverting from 1.60 to 1.58 allows test to pass). > > > > 143. acfunctio

Re: AC_FUNC_GETLOADAVG

2002-05-26 Thread Paul Eggert
> From: Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 20:36:14 +0100 > > How's your bug? Mine is still there... I assume that mine is still there too. I haven't had time to look lately.

Re: AC_FUNC_GETLOADAVG

2002-05-26 Thread Patrick Welche
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 10:08:54PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > > From: Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 16:41:08 +0100 > > > > I'm afraid the new version of functions.m4 doesn't work for me > > (reverting from 1.60 to 1.58 allows test to pass). > > > > 143. acfunctio

Re: AC_FUNC_GETLOADAVG

2002-05-13 Thread Patrick Welche
And of course your failed test works for me :/ % cd tests % testsuite -v -x -d 4 ... % cd testsuite.dir/004 % cat configure.ac define([active], [ACTIVE]) % ../../autoconf -t define | sed -n '$p' configure.ac:1:define:active:ACTIVE % cat autom4te.cache/traces.0 m4trace:configure.ac:1: -1- define([

Re: AC_FUNC_GETLOADAVG

2002-05-12 Thread Paul Eggert
> From: Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 16:41:08 +0100 > > I'm afraid the new version of functions.m4 doesn't work for me > (reverting from 1.60 to 1.58 allows test to pass). > > 143. acfunctions.at:15: FAILED near `acfunctions.at:15' > > with > > +configure: error: