Paul Eggert wrote:
Lorenzo Bettini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm using this macro AC_C_CONST in a configure script of a program
that uses both C and C++.
The current Autoconf documentation says of AC_C_CONST "This macro is
obsolescent, as current C compilers support `const'. New programs
n
Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not using AC_C_CONST might not be an option for folks who need to deal
> with older C compilers, but I can see that the number of folks who need
> both older C compilers *and* C++ is probably a *very* small number.
"Small" meaning less than 1, I suspect.
Not using AC_C_CONST might not be an option for folks who need to deal
with older C compilers, but I can see that the number of folks who need
both older C compilers *and* C++ is probably a *very* small number.
H
___
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@gnu.
Lorenzo Bettini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm using this macro AC_C_CONST in a configure script of a program
> that uses both C and C++.
The current Autoconf documentation says of AC_C_CONST "This macro is
obsolescent, as current C compilers support `const'. New programs
need not use this ma
