> Could you perhaps consult your manual and find out whether that
> old version had an equivalent to the -qsuffix option?
I couldn't find any mention, that's why I asked :-/ Sorry...
Cheers,
//lat
--
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable
one persists in trying to ada
Dear Lassi A. Tuura, you wrote on Today:
> $ cat foo.f90
> SUBROUTINE foo
> RETURN
> END
> $ xlf -qsuffix=f=f90 foo.f90
> xlf: 1501-218 file foo.f90 contains an incorrect file suffix
> ld: 0711-715 ERROR: File foo.f90 cannot be processed.
> The file must be an object fi
