Re: [PATCH] posix-shell.m4: reject Solaris 11's /bin/sh (due to umask)

Jim Meyering wrote: > Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Eric Blake wrote: >>> According to Jim Meyering on 9/16/2008 3:58 AM: Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I discovered that Solaris 11's /bin/sh exhibits the following > surprising behavior: > > $ /

Re: [PATCH] posix-shell.m4: reject Solaris 11's /bin/sh (due to umask)

Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Blake wrote: >> According to Jim Meyering on 9/16/2008 3:58 AM: >>> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I discovered that Solaris 11's /bin/sh exhibits the following surprising behavior: $ /bin/sh -c 'umask 22; (umask 0);

Re: [PATCH] posix-shell.m4: reject Solaris 11's /bin/sh (due to umask)

Eric Blake wrote: > According to Jim Meyering on 9/16/2008 3:58 AM: >> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I discovered that Solaris 11's /bin/sh exhibits the following >>> surprising behavior: >>> >>> $ /bin/sh -c 'umask 22; (umask 0); umask' >>> > > We should also document t

Re: [PATCH] posix-shell.m4: reject Solaris 11's /bin/sh (due to umask)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Jim Meyering on 9/16/2008 3:58 AM: > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I discovered that Solaris 11's /bin/sh exhibits the following >> surprising behavior: >> >> $ /bin/sh -c 'umask 22; (umask 0); umask' >> We shoul