Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada)

2001-04-18 Thread "Jürgen A. Erhard"
> "Greg" == Greg A Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [Sorry for `spamming' the whole list, but I really want this to be on the public record:] Greg> Meanwhile if someone tries to post a legitimate message from Greg> a blocked site (eg. an open relay) then in reality none of Greg>

Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada)

2001-04-09 Thread Mike Castle
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 09:43:29PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote: > The only *fair* thing to do is to block all e-mail from all known and > proven open relays and spam sources. *IFF* this ever causes any Except that there are multiple definitions of "proven open relays" and valid sites get put onto

Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada)

2001-04-09 Thread Esben Haabendal Soerensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg A. Woods) writes: > That's simply not true at all. All even half-decent MLMs have the > ability to allow posting to explicit addressees without also sending > posts to those addresses. Isn't this functionality normally limited to list administrators ? These poor guys mig

Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada)

2001-04-08 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg A. Woods) writes: gaw> That's simply not true at all. All even half-decent MLMs have the gaw> ability to allow posting to explicit addressees without also sending gaw> posts to those addresses. That may be true, but I don't run into many "half-decent MLMs" then.

RE: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada)

2001-04-08 Thread Tim Van Holder
> The only *fair* thing to do is to block all e-mail from all known and > proven open relays and spam sources. *IFF* this ever causes any > legitimate messages to be blocked then the only effect will be positive > in that the user who gets the bounce will learn that his site is well > known as a

Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada)

2001-04-07 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On , April 7, 2001 at 19:52:01 (-0400), Paul D. Smith wrote: ] > Subject: Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada) > > I find subscriber-only lists annoying and elitist, and I don't subscribe > to them. That's too bad. With most modern MLM software the

Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada)

2001-04-07 Thread D. Stimits
Russ Allbery wrote: > > Paul D Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Savannah doesn't support forums; the site explicitly says they're not > > needed since we have mailing lists. > > > I agree with them: web-based forums suck compared to mailing lists. I > > wish more SourceForge groups woul

Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada)

2001-04-07 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Saturday, April 7, 2001 at 20:43:07 (+0200), Tim Van Holder wrote: ] > Subject: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada) > > I agree with the FSF on this one - better let through 10 spams than block > 1 important mail; similar to your argument, most everyone on gnu.org > mailing li

Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada)

2001-04-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Paul D Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Savannah doesn't support forums; the site explicitly says they're not > needed since we have mailing lists. > I agree with them: web-based forums suck compared to mailing lists. I > wish more SourceForge groups would use mailing lists instead of forums

Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada)

2001-04-07 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% "Tim Van Holder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> In fact I'd hope most such new lists will be set up so that only >> subscribers may post freely to them. I find subscriber-only lists annoying and elitist, and I don't subscribe to them. My company explicitly rewrites all my email so that i