Re: Definition of cross-compiling

2000-04-29 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Quoth Ian Lance Taylor: > This works because build != host only arises when the user does > something odd. If you are building with a cross-compiler, you should > use --host. If you are not building with a cross-compiler, you should > not use --host. > > What actual case are you concerned abou

Re: Definition of cross-compiling

2000-04-28 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
From: Felix Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 14:19:00 -0700 Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > - Ideal cross compiling situation: > The user said --host. This gives a better control than build != host. what if I'm specifying --host because for some reason I

Re: Definition of cross-compiling

2000-04-28 Thread Felix Lee
Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > - Ideal cross compiling situation: > The user said --host. This gives a better control than build != host. what if I'm specifying --host because for some reason I don't like the string that config.guess comes up with? for instance, I'm building on a sparc-

RE: Definition of cross-compiling

2000-04-28 Thread Bernard Dautrevaux
> -Original Message- > From: Akim Demaille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 12:36 PM > To: Peter Eisentraut > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Definition of cross-compiling > > > - Ideal cross compiling situation: > The u

Re: Definition of cross-compiling

2000-04-28 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 04:30:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Perhaps this is a stupid idea, but what about some kind of config.compare script that takes two arguments (the $host and the $build) and figures out if the two are "really the same" or if a cross compil

Re: Definition of cross-compiling

2000-04-28 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 12:12:31 +0200 (MET DST) From: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1) build != host -- That won't work because firstly config.sub isn't quite that smart to guarantee lexical equalness in all cases, the problem often being the vendor part being kinda random.

Re: Definition of cross-compiling

2000-04-28 Thread Mo DeJong
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Okay, so I don't claim to know a thing about cross-compilation, but the > current confusion around these parts doesn't help either. So let's pose > this question: How do you *define* a cross-compilation situation, at least > for the purposes of the A

Re: Definition of cross-compiling

2000-04-28 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Peter" == Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter> Okay, so I don't claim to know a thing about cross-compilation, Peter> but the current confusion around these parts doesn't help Peter> either. 2 * likewise :) Here is my understanding, plus some of my opinion (forged by list