[Sorry - fingerslip caused a send]
> Does it work at all?
> I just downloaded the most recent version and ran configure, and among
> other things it said:-
>
> [snip]
That's because 2.49c didn't have the pathsep deduction yet.
The current CVS autoconf should find those apps.
> Does it work at all?
> I just downloaded the most recent version and ran configure, and among
> other things it said:-
[snip]
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 04:35:08PM +0100, Tim Van Holder wrote:
> > Does AUTOCONF provide support for DOS pathnames? ie drive letters,
> > '\' in directories and ';' as separators in paths?
> It's starting to. The current CVS autoconf has had several patches
> applied for better DOS support. It'
> Does AUTOCONF provide support for DOS pathnames? ie drive letters,
> '\' in directories and ';' as separators in paths?
It's starting to. The current CVS autoconf has had several patches
applied for better DOS support. It's not quite perfect yet, but a
LOT better than stock 2.13.
Tim Van Hold
