Re: --build and --host

2002-03-04 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 04 Mar 2002, Akim Demaille wrote: > > "Henrique" == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Henrique> It also means Debian will need to fork config.guess > Henrique> permanently so as to force autoconf stuff to build using the > Henrique> correct host arch (since ther

Re: --build and --host

2002-03-04 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Henrique" == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Henrique> It also means Debian will need to fork config.guess Henrique> permanently so as to force autoconf stuff to build using the Henrique> correct host arch (since there seems to be no way to Henrique> sepecify a buil

Re: --build and --host

2002-02-28 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > I think you just want to specify --build, no? *I* would be happy enough specifying --build (for autoconf 2.52+), and sending fix for any eventual breakages that causes to upstream... But one can count on someone getting all pissed in d-devel that

Re: --build and --host

2002-02-28 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 05:06:40PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > It also means Debian will need to fork config.guess permanently so as to > force autoconf stuff to build using the correct host arch (since there seems > to be no way to sepecify a build architecture without entering >

RE: --build and --host

2002-02-28 Thread Dan Kegel
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >It also means Debian will need to fork config.guess >permanently so as to force autoconf stuff to build using >the correct host arch (since there seems to be no way to >sepecify a build architecture without entering >cross-compiling mode or risking weird side

Re: --build and --host

2002-02-28 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Akim Demaille wrote: > Hi! Sorry for not having answered before, I lost this thread in the > mass the others :( Heh, ok. > It was decided to make this move at the same moment as the chain of > defaults (which was fairly incoherent) was fixed. Because of the > chain of defa

Re: --build and --host

2002-02-28 Thread Akim Demaille
| Hello, Hi! Sorry for not having answered before, I lost this thread in the mass the others :( | In case Henrique's posting wasn't clear, the question is this: is | | ./configure --build=foo ... | | different from | | ./configure --build=foo --host=foo ... | | or not? In othe

Re: --build and --host

2002-02-14 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 04:56:43PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Am Don, 2002-02-14 um 16.17 schrieb Steve M. Robbins: > > 3. Generated configure scripts have this bit > > > > ac_tool_prefix= > > test -n "$host_alias" && ac_tool_prefix=$host_alias- > AFAIU, this is the origin of Ian's question

RE: --build and --host

2002-02-14 Thread Bernard Dautrevaux
> -Original Message- > From: Ralf Corsepius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 4:57 PM > To: Steve M. Robbins > Cc: GNU autoconf Mailing List > Subject: Re: --build and --host > > > > So, we really just wanted to know which i

Re: --build and --host

2002-02-14 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Am Don, 2002-02-14 um 16.17 schrieb Steve M. Robbins: > Hello, > > In case Henrique's posting wasn't clear, the question is this: is > > ./configure --build=foo ... > > different from > > ./configure --build=foo --host=foo ... > > or not? IMO, it is supposed not to be different.