Re: [vsipl++] Re: overriding autoconf's own exeext detection

2006-01-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Stefan, Sorry for the huge delay. I waited a while for comments, and then forgot about this. * Stefan Seefeld wrote on Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 04:24:39PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >Not that I know of. You can always define your own macro, for example > >a fixed version with the same n

Re: [vsipl++] Re: overriding autoconf's own exeext detection

2005-11-12 Thread Stefan Seefeld
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Stefan, * Stefan Seefeld wrote on Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 06:08:29PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Does the patch below fix it? It looks good, though there is at least one more extension: '.inf', which is generated with optimization. Other files with extensions '.dbo'

Re: [vsipl++] Re: overriding autoconf's own exeext detection

2005-11-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Stefan, * Stefan Seefeld wrote on Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 06:08:29PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > >Does the patch below fix it? > > It looks good, though there is at least one more extension: '.inf', > which is generated with optimization. Other files with extensions > '.dbo', '.dla', etc.

Re: [vsipl++] Re: overriding autoconf's own exeext detection

2005-11-11 Thread Stefan Seefeld
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Does the patch below fix it? It looks good, though there is at least one more extension: '.inf', which is generated with optimization. Other files with extensions '.dbo', '.dla', etc. are created when object files are produces, but these don't seem to confuse configure.

Re: overriding autoconf's own exeext detection

2005-11-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Stefan, * Stefan Seefeld wrote on Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:31:18PM CET: > I'm using autoconf with a greenhills cross-compiler. > It compiles source code into .ppc executables, but > generates auxiliary files with other extensions on-the-fly > (.map, for example). Does the patch below fix it? >

overriding autoconf's own exeext detection

2005-11-11 Thread Stefan Seefeld
I'm using autoconf with a greenhills cross-compiler. It compiles source code into .ppc executables, but generates auxiliary files with other extensions on-the-fly (.map, for example). Unfortunately, the way autoconf detects a compiler's default executable extension is by making some guesses, and

EXEEXT

2002-12-21 Thread John Poltorak
Is there anything like a guide to how EXEEXT should be incorporated into a build system? I'm currenty able to build RSYNC on OS/2 using the standard autoconf, configure, make process, but need so manual intervention to convert the final binary file into a .EXE. I think I could get the

Re: Cached exeext values with Libtool 1.4 and autoconf 2.50

2001-07-04 Thread Alexandre Oliva
hing is that it appears that autoconf has indeed changed the no-exeext value, so config.caches can no longer be shared between configure scripts built using autoconf 2.13 and those built with autoconf 2.50. I suppose autoconf should have renamed the cache variable when its contents changed. Anyway, th

Re: [patch] override sloppy ltconfig exeext test

2001-01-22 Thread Akim Demaille
2000-01-19 Lars J. Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * aclang.m4 (_AC_COMPILER_EXEEXT_*): export ac_cv_exeext + Please, don't do that.

Re: [patch] override sloppy ltconfig exeext test

2001-01-22 Thread Akim Demaille
OK with me, and in the cvs commit queue.

[patch] override sloppy ltconfig exeext test

2001-01-19 Thread Lars J. Aas
I suggested this one before, but there was never any comments, so here's a more "official" submittal... I know it's kind of "the wrong fix", but a right fix won't help with the latest released libtool, and a new libtool release can be some time off... 2000-01-19 Lars J. Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[PATCH] uncooperating autoconf/libtool exeext tests

2001-01-11 Thread Lars J. Aas
s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * aclang.m4 (_AC_COMPILER_EXEEXT_DEFAULT,_AC_COMPILER_EXEEXT_O): Export ac_cv_exeext to environment to override incorrect exeext test in ltconfig from libtool-1.3.5. Index: aclang.m4 === RCS file:

Re: EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.)

2000-12-16 Thread Alexandre Oliva
I thought I had sent this before, but I'm not sure I did... Sorry if it's a duplicate. On Dec 15, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +if ls a.* >/dev/null 2>&1; then > + rm -rf conftestdir > + mkdir conftestdir > + mv a.* conftestdir > +fi [snip] > +if test -d conftestdir; then

RE: EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.)

2000-12-15 Thread Bernard Dautrevaux
> -Original Message- > From: Akim Demaille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 3:49 PM > To: Bernard Dautrevaux > Cc: Alexandre Oliva; Mo DeJong; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; APatche > Subject: Re: EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.) > > >

Re: EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.)

2000-12-15 Thread Akim Demaille
| > +AS_IFELSE([AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_link)], | > + [for ac_file in `ls a.exe conftest.exe a.* | > conftest.* 2>/dev/null`; do | | Here one may also check for plain "conftest"; this saves the second link :-) | | for ac_file in `ls a.exe conftest.exe conftest a.* conftest.* 2>/dev/null`; | do

RE: EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.)

2000-12-15 Thread Bernard Dautrevaux
> -Original Message- > From: Akim Demaille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 3:06 PM > To: Bernard Dautrevaux > Cc: Alexandre Oliva; Mo DeJong; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; APatche > Subject: Re: EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.) > >

Re: EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.)

2000-12-15 Thread Akim Demaille
*.d | *.pdb ) ;; -*) ac_cv_exeext=`expr "$ac_file" : 'conftest\(.*\)'` +*) ac_cv_exeext=`expr "$ac_file" : '[^.]*\(\..*\)'` break;; esac done], [AC_MSG_ERROR([cannot compute EXEEXT: cannot compile and link])]) -rm -f conftest$

Re: EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.)

2000-12-15 Thread Akim Demaille
| Looks fine but what about compilers, I know a few of them, that generates | and executable named after the first source or object file listed if no '-o' | option is given; for example: | $(CC) xxx.c yyy.o | will generate xxx, or maybe xxx.exe if the host request it. No kidding!?!? I'l

RE: EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.)

2000-12-15 Thread Bernard Dautrevaux
> -Original Message- > From: Akim Demaille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 10:42 AM > To: Alexandre Oliva > Cc: Mo DeJong; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; APatche > Subject: EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.) > > > > Here is my pro

Re: EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.)

2000-12-15 Thread Akim Demaille
+ 2>/dev/null`; do case $ac_file in *.$ac_ext | *.o | *.obj | *.xcoff | *.tds | *.d | *.pdb ) ;; *) ac_cv_exeext=`expr "$ac_file" : 'conftest\(.*\)'` @@ -675,7 +705,24 @@ esac done], [AC_MSG_ERROR([cannot compute EXEEXT: cann

Re: EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.)

2000-12-15 Thread Mo DeJong
xeext not ac_cv_exeext +ac_exeext_save=$ac_exeext +ac_exeext=$ac_cv_exeext +_AC_LINK_IFELSE([], [# If both `conftest.exe' and `conftest' are `present' (well, observable) # catch `conftest.exe'. For instance with Cygwin, `ls conftest' will # work properly (i.e., refer

EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.)

2000-12-15 Thread Akim Demaille
`ls conftest$ac_cv_exeext conftest.exe conftest conftest.* \ + 2>/dev/null`; do case $ac_file in *.$ac_ext | *.o | *.obj | *.xcoff | *.tds | *.d | *.pdb ) ;; *) ac_cv_exeext=`expr "$ac_file" : 'conftest\(.*\)'` @@ -675,7 +701,24 @@ esa