Hello Tomas,
* Tomas Carnecky wrote on Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:00:43AM CET:
> On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:36 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Last time we looked at this code because someone reported oddities, we
> > concluded that we shouldn't change the test because we had no way of
> > verifying whether
On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:36 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Tomas,
>
> * Tomas Carnecky wrote on Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:10:47PM CET:
>> I just ran the clang static analyzer on the xserver configure script and
>> it reported a few issues. Most of them were dead assignments/increments,
>> but ther
Hello Tomas,
* Tomas Carnecky wrote on Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:10:47PM CET:
> I just ran the clang static analyzer on the xserver configure script and
> it reported a few issues. Most of them were dead assignments/increments,
> but there also was one dereference of an undefined pointer value. I
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Ruben Safir on 12/6/2009 7:15 PM:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:10:47PM +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
>> I just ran the clang static analyzer on the xserver configure script and
>> it reported a few issues. Most of them were dead assignments
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:10:47PM +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> I just ran the clang static analyzer on the xserver configure script and
> it reported a few issues. Most of them were dead assignments/increments,
> but there also was one dereference of an undefined pointer value. I
> don't know wh
I just ran the clang static analyzer on the xserver configure script and
it reported a few issues. Most of them were dead assignments/increments,
but there also was one dereference of an undefined pointer value. I
don't know which tests the conftest.c belongs to, but I doubt it's to
test if an appl
