"Ben Bergen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It looks like it would be fairly easy to just introduce new language
> defines like PPUC and SPUC, etc... Does this seem reasonable given
> that two different C/C++ compilers need to be configured at the same
> time?
I suspect so, though I haven't had t
Here is a link to the development tools for the cell:
http://www.bsc.es/projects/deepcomputing/linuxoncell/cbexdev.html?S_TACT=105AGX16&S_CMP=DWPA
Overview of the processor:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/power/library/pa-cellperf
General link to simulator and other tools:
http://domino.r
Paul,
I hope that it is OK to attach a file. Here is an example of how I am
compiling a program for the cell. Disclaimer: I realize that my make
rules (in rules.mk) are probably a little whacky...
--
Benjamin Karl Bergen
CCS-2 Continuum Dynamics
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Makefile
Paul,
the cell does use C and C++ compilers. However, programs for the
different "sub-processors", i.e., the PPE and the SPEs (the PPE is the
single PowerPC processor, and the SPEs are the 8 synergistic
processing elements), must be compiled using separate compilers.
Additionally, the SPE progra
Thanks for your interest. For Autoconf, the language we added support
for most recently was Erlang, so my suggestion would be to look
everywhere in the Autoconf source for "Erlang" (ignoring case), and do
something similar for your language.
I'm not familiar with ppuc. I thought that people were
Hi,
I am working at the Los Alamos National Laboratory on a project
involving the IBM Cell processor. Building for the cell requires
several compilation steps with different compilers. I would like to
add to the languages supported by autotools so that there is a simple
way to define and build
