On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
>
> recent GCC versions default to C99 or even C11. I was expecting that adding
> AC_PROG_CC_C89 to configure.ac, would force C89, probably by using
> -std=gnu89. But this was not the case. Any ideas why?
Originally, AC_PROG_CC_C89 meant
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, Paul Eggert wrote:
Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
I was expecting that adding AC_PROG_CC_C89 to configure.ac, would force C89
Eeeuuw. Who would want to do that?
See the context in my first email, apparently some defines were not very
well thought. Passing -std=gnu89 to CFL
Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
I was expecting that adding AC_PROG_CC_C89 to configure.ac, would force C89
Eeeuuw. Who would want to do that?
To some extent AC_PROG_CC_C89 is obsolete, and I don't recommend using it, just
as I don't recommend C89.
___
Hello list,
recent GCC versions default to C99 or even C11. I was expecting that
adding AC_PROG_CC_C89 to configure.ac, would force C89, probably by using
-std=gnu89. But this was not the case. Any ideas why?
Context is compiling a C program using a recent gcc on Solaris 10,
resulted to thi
