> -Original Message-
> From: Keith Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 06:44
> To: autoconf@gnu.org
> Cc: Howard Larson; 'Ralf Wildenhues'; 'Eric Blake'
> Subject: Re: [autoconf 2.63] 95 of 353 tests fail
>
>
On Friday 19 September 2008 21:31:15 Howard Larson wrote:
> > FWIW Ralf, I've just built autoconf-2.63 on an MSYS-1.0.11 box at
> > work. No errors in building. I've left the testsuite running,
> > but will not be able to report the final result until Monday; (I
> > don't use msw on my own boxes)
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 10:52
> To: autoconf@gnu.org
> Cc: 'Ralf Wildenhues'; Eric Blake; Howard Larson
> Subject: Re: [autoconf 2.63] 95 of 353 tests fail
>
> On Thursda
On Thursday 18 September 2008 06:07:28 'Ralf Wildenhues' wrote:
> > > I have performed a search for a conftest.obj file and it does
> > > not exist. As I mentioned in an earlier email, build of
> > > libtool failed to produce any .obj files.
> > >
> > > I have installed MinGW. Does it not have gc
-Original Message-
From: 'Ralf Wildenhues' [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 00:07
To: Eric Blake
Cc: Howard Larson; autoconf@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [autoconf 2.63] 95 of 353 tests fail
* Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:25:16AM CEST:
>
* Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:25:16AM CEST:
> Please don't top-post.
>
> > I have performed a search for a conftest.obj file and it does not exist. As
> > I mentioned in an earlier email, build of libtool failed to produce any .obj
> > files.
> >
> > I have installed MinGW. Does
Please don't top-post.
> I have performed a search for a conftest.obj file and it does not exist. As
> I mentioned in an earlier email, build of libtool failed to produce any .obj
> files.
>
> I have installed MinGW. Does it not have gcc? If not, how do I ensure make
> check is using gcc? (I a
.)
--Howard Larson
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ralf Wildenhues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 16:08
To: Howard Larson
Cc: autoconf@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [autoconf 2.63] 95 of 353 tests fail
Hello Howard,
Thanks for the report. Please, if
-Original Message-
From: Ralf Wildenhues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 16:08
To: Howard Larson
Cc: autoconf@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [autoconf 2.63] 95 of 353 tests fail
Hello Howard,
Thanks for the report. Please, if possible, do not start new threads
for
Hello Howard,
Thanks for the report. Please, if possible, do not start new threads
for messages to the same topic. Thanks.
* Howard Larson wrote on Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:25:01PM CEST:
>
> Obviously something is broken. Need advice on next course of action; tear
> down the entire system and
testsuite.log may be downloaded from
http://hblarson.home.comcast.net/testsuite.7z
--
Howard Larson
___
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
Running autoconf make check was prompted by make failure for libtool: No
object files or executables were produced. In retrospect, config.h had two
instances of #include ""
Other info: msys was reinstalled along with all updates which seemed to fix
earlier problems with automake build. m4 was l
12 matches
Mail list logo
