vial, but
perhaps your proposed autoport is overkill. I you are finding things that
are not portable, but are not covered by autoscan, then perhaps patching
autoscan is the path of least resistance. Patches to libiberty should also
be possible if required.
Cheers,
Mikal
--
Michael Still ([EMAIL PROTE
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Tom Holroyd wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Michael Still wrote:
>
> > Autoconf could run gnupg / pgp (if present) after generating the configure
> > script and produce a checksum on the script. If this was a default action,
> > then it would increase
On 23 Apr 2001, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Michael Still <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Autoconf could run gnupg / pgp (if present) after generating the
> > configure script and produce a checksum on the script. If this was a
> > default action, then it would inc
/ pgp (if present) after generating the configure
script and produce a checksum on the script. If this was a default action,
then it would increase the chance of developers having at least some
checksumming.
It doesn't fix doubt over the intentions of the developer though.
Mikal
--
Michael Still (
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Tamas SZERB wrote:
> toma@titanic:~/pptpd-1.0.1$ autoheader
> Autoconf requires GNU m4 1.1 or later
> toma@titanic:~/pptpd-1.0.1$ echo $?
I'm not sure I follow your post, but autoconf requires GNU m4, which can
be downloaded from the GNU website.
Cheers,
Mika
