Re: coreutils-5.1.3 released: bug-fix-only, candidate for stable 5.2.0

2004-02-11 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 12:33:52PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote: > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've never heard of a shell performing the // -> / substitution > > indiscriminately. > > Me neither. > > Autoconf is littered with code like this: > > ac_script='s/\$U\././;s/\.o$//;

Re: coreutils-5.1.3 released: bug-fix-only, candidate for stable 5.2.0

2004-02-11 Thread Lars Hecking
> Does any Tru64 expert know whether this bug has been fixed in later > versions, (e.g., Tru64 5.1A) and/or whether it was present in earlier > versions (e.g., Tru64 5.0A or 4.0G)? Is a patch available for Tru64 > 5.1? On Tru64 4.0F (OSF1 V4.0 1229 alpha), I get two slashes. The machine has o

Re: coreutils-5.1.3 released: bug-fix-only, candidate for stable5.2.0

2004-02-11 Thread Bruce Korb
Paul Eggert wrote: > Autoconf is littered with code like this: > > ac_script='s/\$U\././;s/\.o$//;s/\.obj$//' > ac_i=`echo "$ac_i" | sed "$ac_script"` > > This passes an argument with two trailing slashes to 'sed'. > Does it misbehave too, under OSF/Tru64 5.1? It cannot possibly and if it d

Re: coreutils-5.1.3 released: bug-fix-only, candidate for stable 5.2.0

2004-02-11 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Jim Meyering wrote: > That's due to a bug in OSF 5.1's /bin/sh. it's been Tru64 for a few years. time to upgrade. > When I ran that same test a few days ago, I found that it would > pass when invoked using bash, and so I didn't dig any deeper. > Your report has prompted me t

Re: coreutils-5.1.3 released: bug-fix-only, candidate for stable 5.2.0

2004-02-11 Thread Paul Eggert
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've never heard of a shell performing the // -> / substitution > indiscriminately. Me neither. Autoconf is littered with code like this: ac_script='s/\$U\././;s/\.o$//;s/\.obj$//' ac_i=`echo "$ac_i" | sed "$ac_script"` This passes an argument wit

Re: func_infer_tag() broken on IRIX 6.5

2004-02-11 Thread Eric Sunshine
Gary V. Vaughan wrote: I've used return in a couple of places (twice with an integer return value), which I fear may break on old platforms. Otherwise I've assumed that all shell variables are in global scope, and that positional parameters are stacked and restored at function call boundaries to

Re: func_infer_tag() broken on IRIX 6.5

2004-02-11 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Albert Chin wrote: | So this means func_infer_tag() is broken in branch-1-5 because it does | this: | func_infer_tag () { | if test -n "$available_tags" && test -z "$tagname"; then | CC_quoted= | ... | # Blanks at the start of

RE: Autoconf Error Messages

2004-02-11 Thread Drummonds, Scott B
Apologies, all. My missing macro definitions were due to an incomplete macro directory search path. This is an issue with my build environment, and not Autoconf-specific. Sorry, Scott > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Drummonds,

Shell-parsing test program (was Re: coreutils-5.1.3 released: bug-fix-only, candidate for stable 5.2.0)

2004-02-11 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 11:48:09AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > $ echo / // /// .// //. > $ echo abc| tr -t ab // Here's a trivial little debugging aid I can't live without, for testing and isolating just such things without driving oneself crazy, or resorting to painful contortions like

Autoconf Error Messages

2004-02-11 Thread Drummonds, Scott B
Hi, everyone, After upgrading my existing build environment to Autoconf 2.54 (it took a lot of work to get it here from 2.13, and upgrading my not be possible), I'm getting the following error messages, and I don't know where to start. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1047> autoconf configure:2675: error: possi

autocsan failure

2004-02-11 Thread Lars Hecking
Trying to auto* a project. $ autoscan --version autoscan (GNU Autoconf) 2.59 Written by David J. MacKenzie and Akim Demaille. Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FI

Re: coreutils-5.1.3 released: bug-fix-only, candidate for stable 5.2.0

2004-02-11 Thread Michael Elizabeth Chastain
$ x=// $ eval "echo \$x" / Okay, I confirm this on spe147.testdrive.hp.com with /bin/sh. $ echo / // /// .// //. / / // /// ./ //. Confirmed. This also happens with /usr/bin/echo. $ set -x $ echo abc| tr -t ab // + echo abc + tr -t ab / /bc Confirmed on the "+" lines,

Re: coreutils-5.1.3 released: bug-fix-only, candidate for stable 5.2.0

2004-02-11 Thread Jim Meyering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) wrote: > I tried coreutils 5.1.3 on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and alphaev68-dec-osf5.1. > I ran into several problems, documented below. ... Thanks again for the testing and report. > alphaev68-dec-osf5.1, gnu make 3.79.1, osf cc > > configure works >