Closing
Techniques Workshop
One
day workshop
What if
the customer says:
·
·
Its too
expensive
·
·
Were happy
with our present supplier
·
·
I want to
think about it
Can you handle these common
objections?
By far the mos
Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Bill Moseley wrote:
>> If I add a note to our README does is there any difference between:
>> LDFLAGS=-R/usr/local/lib
>> and
>> LD_RUN_PATH=/usr/local/lib
> You should provide the LDFLAGS option to configure. LD_RUN_PATH
>>> "Bill" == Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Bill> So I'm just asking if $< is not portable (but it's ok to use $@)?
Bill> Or am I using $< incorrectly?
$< is portable only in inference rules (not your case here).
$@ is OK in any kind of rule.
Run
info '(autoconf)Limitat
Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sorry, I cut from the wrong makefile. I have this in a
> Makefile.am, not the above:
> $(srcdir)/swish-e.1 : $(top_srcdir)/pod/swish-e.pod
> -rm -f $@
> -pod2man --center="SWISH-E Documentation" --lax --release='$(VERSION)' $<
> >
Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When Sun introduced LD_LIBRARY_PATH in its operating systems (later
> adopted by Linux) it was described as a tool for use by developers
> rather than end-users. For Solaris, I prefer -R, but Linux and FreeBSD
> users will likely prefer to do without.
> > In a Makefile.in I have:
> >
> > %.1: ../pod/%.pod
> > pod2man --center="SWISH-E Documentation" --lax --release='$(VERSION)' $< >
> > $@
I'm sorry, I cut from the wrong makefile. I have this in a
Makefile.am, not the above:
$(srcdir)/swish-e.1 : $(top_srcdir)/pod/swish-e.pod
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> =>A correct -R option needs to be specified, or set LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
> May I suggest that you *not* use LD_LIBRARY_PATH? The real purpose of
> LD_LP is to allow a program to pick from multiple shared objects at
> loadtime. It's a bad thing to use this a
On Tuesday, Oct 21st 2003 at 14:29 -0500, quoth Bob Friesenhahn:
=>> What's happening is configure and make run fine, but ldd shows "not
=>> found" for libz's runtime linkage.
=>>
=>> I'm linking with zlib which is installed in /usr/local/lib, but it seems
=>> that on this machine (Solaris 2.6) th
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Bill Moseley wrote:
>
> If I add a note to our README does is there any difference between:
>
> LDFLAGS=-R/usr/local/lib
>
> and
>
> LD_RUN_PATH=/usr/local/lib
You should provide the LDFLAGS option to configure. LD_RUN_PATH is a
non-standard environment variable.
Bob
===
Thanks Peter and Bob.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 09:28:00PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Build-time linker path and run-time linker path are two different things.
>
> > I'm linking with zlib which is installed in /usr/local/lib, but it seems
> > that on this machine (Solaris 2.6) that /usr/local
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Bill Moseley wrote:
> I'm revisiting an old thread. I'm using autoconf 2.57.
>
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2003-06/msg00013.html
>
> If I use AC_CHECK_LIB does configure try to *run* the program?
No. It only does a link to see if the specified symbol is re
Bill Moseley writes:
> If I use AC_CHECK_LIB does configure try to *run* the program?
No.
> What's happening is configure and make run fine, but ldd shows "not
> found" for libz's runtime linkage.
Build-time linker path and run-time linker path are two different things.
> I'm linking with zlib
I'm revisiting an old thread. I'm using autoconf 2.57.
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2003-06/msg00013.html
If I use AC_CHECK_LIB does configure try to *run* the program?
What's happening is configure and make run fine, but ldd shows "not
found" for libz's runtime linkage.
I'm lin
Protect Your Children With ProtecTV.
ProtecTV gives you the power to block the cursing and offensive language coming into
your home through television and video.
ProtecTV filters out more than 400 offensive words.
ProtecTV works with your TV, VCR, Satellite, Cable Box and DVD player.
ProtecTV
Title: Untitled Document
Hydrocodone at a Discount
Vicodin ES 90 Tab Special. Buy Now!
Free Doctors consultation
No More pain- Get more info Now
No more please
15 matches
Mail list logo