Re: autoreconf misses ltmain.sh

2002-09-25 Thread Paul Eggert
> From: Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 25 Sep 2002 12:03:42 +0200 > > Please, install! OK, done. I did find some errors in my proposed text (it didn't give the obvious workaround, and it credited the wrong people for the patch -- ouch!), so I installed the following patch instead.

defined(IRIX)

2002-09-25 Thread Bill Moseley
Hi, Does anyone know what macro name I can use to detect when running on IRIX 6.5? I don't have access to the machine so I can't poke around headers. I'm not sure if there's an autoconf solution, or if I just need to find out what name I can use. I thought I could use #if defined(IRIX) but the

Automake 1.7 released

2002-09-25 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
We're pleased to announce the release of Automake 1.7. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements. The NEWS entry is appended. You can find the new release here: ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/automake/automake-1.7.tar.gz ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/automake/automake-1.7.tar.

Re: [Andrew Suffield ] Bug#157887:autoconf: various imperfectly formed functions in c.m4

2002-09-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Paul Eggert writes: > A better fix is to use AC_C_PROTOTYPES; it's designed for this > purpose. But AC_C_PROTOTYPES futzes with $CC in order to enable > prototypes if available, and there are some chicken-and-egg problems > here since it assumes we've already found a C compiler and yet now we >

Problem with "unused" AC function

2002-09-25 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello, my configure.in looks like: AC_INIT(test-automake, 0.0.0, [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]) AC_PREREQ(2.52) AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(configure.in) AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR(config) AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h) TEST_AUTOMAKE_USED AC_PROG_CXX AC_PROG_LIBTOOL AC_CONFIG_FILES(Makefile src/Makefile lib/Makefi

Re: Hey SEXY!

2002-09-25 Thread Jodana Cox
Yo Sexy Baby See My Nude Photos @ http://www.adultillusions.com

Re: CVS Autoconf using CVS Autoconf

2002-09-25 Thread Akim Demaille
| On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 05:58:47PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote: | > | > | Just noticed with today's cvs: | > | # gmake install | > | ... | > | gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. | > | /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs /autoconf | > | /bin/sh: Can't open ./mkinstalldirs | > | gmake[2]: **

Re: autoreconf misses ltmain.sh

2002-09-25 Thread Akim Demaille
| > I have not read all the details yet, but does anybody know what we | > must do to cope with Libtool 1.4.2? | | How about this patch to Autoconf? It should let us limp along until a | new libtool version is published. | | --- old/BUGS 2002-03-26 08:14:37.0 -0800 | +++ new/BUGS 200

Re: mkinstalldirs ?

2002-09-25 Thread Patrick Welche
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 05:58:47PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote: > > | Just noticed with today's cvs: > | # gmake install > | ... > | gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. > | /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs /autoconf > | /bin/sh: Can't open ./mkinstalldirs > | gmake[2]: *** [install-pkgdataD

Re: macro AC_Dest

2002-09-25 Thread Akim Demaille
| Hallo, | I have a big problem after upgrading autoconf from 2.53 to 2.54. If I run | autoheader, I get the following message: | | autoheader | configure.in:135: error: m4_popdef: undefined macro: AC_Dest | autoconf/status.m4:844: AC_CONFIG_FILES is expanded from... | configure.in:135: the top