On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 04:52:58PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Does it make sense to just always gzip the
> installed info pages?
That'd be pretty annoying for those of us who want to use grep
and other standard UNIX tools on them... Please don't
gratuitously turn text files into non-text!
--
|
"Walter E. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> harinath wrote:
>> ... the loop in _AC_PROG_CXX_EXIT_DECLARATION
>>
>> for ac_declaration in \
>>''\
>>'#include ' \
[snip]
>> This whole section is necessary since AC_LANG_PROGRAM supports the
>> use of exit() in C/C++ program test fragm
> "John" == John Poltorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> I had a look at a Slackware build script, and found the gzip'ing
John> done there, but it seems to be a natural extension to 'make
John> install'...
John> Wonder if there is any way to incorporate it.
I wouldn't mind an automake p
Thank you, Jan, for your suggestion. Alas, it would result in
non-conforming code: it is not permitted (per 17.4.2.1/3 of the C++
standard) to nest a library header within another namespace.
Nonetheless, I appreciate your kindness in offering assistance.
- WEB
- Original Message
Ah, we're making progress; thank you! This is the first I've heard
that "AC_LANG_PROGRAM supports the use of exit() in C/C++ program test
fragments" -- I haven't found any documentation to this effect. Does
anyone know the rationale for this decision? If so, let's please
ensure it's written dow
Today I updated autoconf from cvs for the first time in a long while.
A simple `configure; make' didn't work. It tries repeatedly to run
autoconf, automake, etc.
Now, this is frustrating because the reason I'm building from cvs is
that I don't have these tools. And, the generated files in the
r
Hi,
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 10:40:17 -0500
>> From: "Walter E. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> Thanks, Paul, for the courteous and quick response.
>>
>> Suppose my program defines entities whose names clash with names
>> declared in .
>
> That's certa
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_00E2_35D84E0E.D6456D76"
> Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 10:40:17 -0500
> From: "Walter E. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Thanks, Paul, for the courteous and quick response.
>
> Suppose my program defines entities whose names clash with names
> declared in .
That's certainly reasonable, but we're not talking about your actual
Walter,
Try thinking of a way to use the namespace feature in C++. Here is a
kludge that may get you over the hump:
namespace std {
#include
};
Now all the stdlib.h rubbish is in the std namespace. But I think the
preprocessor defines will not be.
This is indeed what namespaces are fo
Thanks, Paul, for the courteous and quick response.
Suppose my program defines entities whose names clash with names
declared in . While it is certainly arguable whether this
constitutes good practice, it seems equally certain that such programs
comply with the relevant language standard(s).
(A
11 matches
Mail list logo
