> From: Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence)
>
> OTOH, is it really the purpose of the GCS to include such
> information? That pertains to autoconf.texi IMHO.
The GCS is talking about a more general issue: whether to use
> From: Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 17:07:12 -0600 (MDT)
>
> The copyright notice and permission notice should not go in a separate
> section. They should go in the standard place, on the page after the
> title page if there are such thin
The copyright notice and permission notice should not go in a separate
section. They should go in the standard place, on the page after the
title page if there are such things, or just after the title and
author attribution.
This change (or something like it) needs to be installed at gnu.org.
I guess I can install the change in the master copy, but I don't know
how it gets propagated after that.
You should run the makefile in /gd/gnuorg so as to recreate
standards.text. But please handle standards.texi a
Am 15 Aug 2001 09:44:00 -0500 schrieb Paul Martinolich:
> Sorry, I was unclean. I'll give it another shot. I have this structure
>
> ../src
> ../pkgA
> ../pkgB
>
> src contains my application. Platform A does not provide the third party
> pkgA which I need in the application, whereas Pl
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 04:51:04PM +0200, Tim Van Holder wrote:
> > quartz% sh foo.sh
> > at_times=:
> > 0
>
> Excellent - will install this ASAP.
>
> > (et etant francais aussi, nous retrouvons un petit monde
> > francophone chez autoconf)
>
> Oh no! They're everywhere! :-)
Oops - I should h
> quartz% sh foo.sh
> at_times=:
> 0
Excellent - will install this ASAP.
> (et etant francais aussi, nous retrouvons un petit monde
> francophone chez autoconf)
Oh no! They're everywhere! :-)
> BTW, what ``sort'' of Belgian are you? Wallon, Flamand? I'm from
I'm Flemish, I'm afraid. Why else would I want to de-francophonise
things? ;-P
> Lille, and sometimes go and see my parents up there. We might be able
> to meet some day. Hm... Will you go to `la braderie de Lille'?
I might
Sorry, I was unclean. I'll give it another shot. I have this structure
../src
../pkgA
../pkgB
src contains my application. Platform A does not provide the third party
pkgA which I need in the application, whereas Platform B does. Ditto for
pkgB. Some platforms provide it and others do
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 01:54:42PM +0200, Tim Van Holder wrote:
> > I like the former more.
>
> So do I. I merely provided the second in case the first
> doesn't work.
>
> > Would you install it please? lib/autotest/general.m4. TIA.
>
> Once I see actual confirmation from Patrick that either
> "Tim" == Tim Van Holder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tim> Once I see actual confirmation from Patrick that either solution
Tim> actually works, I'd be glad to do so. I've also got some
Tim> rewordings (de-francophonisation :-) ) lying around for that
Tim> file.
:) :) :)
BTW, what ``sort''
> I like the former more.
So do I. I merely provided the second in case the first
doesn't work.
> Would you install it please? lib/autotest/general.m4. TIA.
Once I see actual confirmation from Patrick that either
solution actually works, I'd be glad to do so.
I've also got some rewordings (de
| > at_times=:
| > times >dev/null 2>&1 && at_times=times
| > $at_times >at-times
| > echo $?
|
| > times: not found
| > 0
|
| This suggests that this works, but that the shell somehow
| doesn't let its 'not found' message be redirected :-(
|
| How about
|
| at_times=:
| (times) >dev/null 2
> at_times=:
> times >dev/null 2>&1 && at_times=times
> $at_times >at-times
> echo $?
> times: not found
> 0
This suggests that this works, but that the shell somehow
doesn't let its 'not found' message be redirected :-(
How about
at_times=:
(times) >dev/null 2>&1 && at_times=times
echo at_t
quartz% cat foo.sh
#! /bin/sh
:; times >at-times 2>/dev/null; echo $?
at_times=:
times >dev/null 2>&1 && at_times=times
$at_times >at-times
echo $?
quartz% sh foo.sh
times: not found
127
times: not found
0
Cheers,
Patrick
| quartz% cat foo.sh
| #! /bin/sh
|
| :; times >at-times 2>/dev/null; echo $?
|
|
| at_times=:
| times >dev/null 2>&1 && at_times=times
| $times >at-times
| echo $?
Sorry, stupid typo :(
cat >foo.sh /dev/null; echo $?
at_times=:
times >dev/null 2>&1 && at_times=times
$at_time
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 12:18:20PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> | Yes - I don't have "times" anywhere.. It does say ! /bin/sh at the top
> | of testsuite afterall, not some other shell. eg. of output from testsuite:
> |
> | 1: tools.at:47 times: not found
> | FAILED near `tools.at:83'
Hm... What do you people think about this?
After all, the core code of projects is not supposed to contain any
HAVE_. Rather, AC_REPLACE_FUNCS etc. should be used, system.h for
other issues, so it seems to me that this is a better solution than
having #if HAVE_ in the main code, but worse than
| Yes - I don't have "times" anywhere.. It does say ! /bin/sh at the top
| of testsuite afterall, not some other shell. eg. of output from testsuite:
|
| 1: tools.at:47 times: not found
| FAILED near `tools.at:83'
Thanks!
What is your platform? How does
:; times >at-times 2>/dev/null
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:52:47AM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> | Tim Van Holder wrote:
> | >
> | > > For some reason, the generated tests/testsuite contains
> | > > times >at-times
> | > > all over the place. What is "times"? I can't find it, and it isn't a
> | > > /bin/sh builtin..
> |
| Tim Van Holder wrote:
| >
| > > For some reason, the generated tests/testsuite contains
| > > times >at-times
| > > all over the place. What is "times"? I can't find it, and it isn't a
| > > /bin/sh builtin..
| >
| > I think it's a bash builtin which reports the elapsed time
| > of all pr
> "Paul" == Paul Martinolich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> I have a configure.ac in which I conditionally configure
Paul> additional sources that have their own ./configure scripts.
Paul> Using AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS works great. But, now I'd like to pass
Paul> some configure options that I d
> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> Nahhh. You can blame it on me
OK, thanks, I appreciate that :)
Well, I sent on autoconf-patches ``18-new-ac-check-header.patch''
which is the start of it. Cannot test it :( Well, I mean I did try
(on Fileutils, CVS Bison and CV
> "Ted" == Ted Irons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ted> What am I doing wrong?
The M4 used at autoconf runtime is not that used at its installation
time. I would reinstall M4 since obviously your install-time m4 is
experimental, and your runtime m4 is the vanilla GNU M4 1.4.
24 matches
Mail list logo
