I was looking at the archives and discovered there wasn't a way to locally
search them.
I want to check for an include file in $GEMSTONE/include, and if its present
add -I$(GEMSTONE)/include to the compile options. I then want to do the same
for some SYBASE include files.
I'm fairly certain a q
On Tuesday 31 July 2001 1:09 am, Grosch, Scott wrote:
> I am having trouble getting a replacement to work. I'm trying this, but I
> get
> an error from sh when I run configure:
>
> AC_CHECK_FUNCS(strrchr, [],
> AC_CHECK_LIB(iberty, strrchr, [],
>
> AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([${srcdir}/re
I am having trouble getting a replacement to work. I'm trying this, but I
get
an error from sh when I run configure:
AC_CHECK_FUNCS(strrchr, [],
AC_CHECK_LIB(iberty, strrchr, [],
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([${srcdir}/replace/strrchr.c])))
I basically want to check for the function,
I recently downloaded the cvs grep to see if it has a bug that 2.4.2 has (it
doesn't), but I came across something else. autoconf makes a configure
script that makes a Makefile which looks to /bin for msgfmt, even though my
msgfmt is in /usr/bin.
What's going on?
--
Andy Goth | [EMAIL PRO
> > . file
> > DESCRIPTION
> > The shell will execute commands from the file in the current
> environment.
> > If file does not contain a slash, the shell will use the search path
> > specified by to find the directory containing file. Unlike
> normal command
Note that the critical piece of in
On Monday 30 July 2001 7:04 am, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> > > > .
> > > > updating cache config.cache
> > > > loading cache config.cache within ltconfig
> > > > /tools/src/lftp-pre2.4.0-3/ltconfig: config.cache: not found
> > > > configure: error: libtool configure failed
> > > >
> > > > The r
> From: "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 00:21:43 -0700
>
> Am I duplicating someone else's effort?
Not as far as I know.
> If not, does this look good? Should I develop a patch?
It looks good to me; perhaps other people on the autoconf list (more
expert th
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 10:04:37AM +0400, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> > Ah, good. Easy fix. Use libtool-1.4 if you don't need
> > multi-language-branch
> > features, ot libtool-1.4b if you do. Neither of these versions
> > have ltconfig
> > at all.
> >
>
> I do not care if ltconfig exists or not
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> Hm... Well, yes, speeding this up would be pretty beneficial.
Akim> IMHO, something which would help could be to have single file
Akim> with only the substitutions to perform, instead of the whole
Akim> Makefile.in, which contains a
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sorry I sent the message by accident :( It was not finished :(
Tom> Lately I've been thinking about speeding up config.status,
Tom> especially as regards automake.
I might be wrong, but I don't think today this is really needed: 2.50
has a
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> Lately I've been thinking about speeding up config.status,
Tom> especially as regards automake.
I might be wrong, but I don't think today this is really needed: 2.50
has a much faster config.status.
Fileutils 4.0, Autoconf 2.12, 19 AC_O
11 matches
Mail list logo