Re: autoconf complains wrongly about version of m4

> However, I'm now trying to use autoconf 2.13 at work on an HP-UX system, > with little success. Sorry I can't reproduce the exact error message I have built autoconf/automake both on HP-UX 10.20 and HP-UX 11.0 with no real trouble. But autoconf-2.13 does not work very well on HP-UX. Note that

Re: newbi question on AC_CHECK_FILE Warning message (...crosscompiling)

Alexandre Oliva writes: > On May 18, 2001, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Alexandre Oliva writes: > >> On May 18, 2001, Andrej Aderhold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > but I just want to have this warning disappear. What shall I do ? > >> > >> You have to stop using this

Re: newbi question on AC_CHECK_FILE Warning message (...cross compiling)

On May 18, 2001, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexandre Oliva writes: >> On May 18, 2001, Andrej Aderhold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > but I just want to have this warning disappear. What shall I do ? >> >> You have to stop using this macro. It correctly warns you that t

Re: 2.49e problems with gcc

On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 03:00:38PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote: > > (partly stolen from AC_CHECK_DECLS) but this requires cvs autoconf, I > believe. > > Yes, it does. And if you require 2.50, then just use AC_CHECK_DECLS :) > > Is there a good way to say this in 2.13-speak, so

Release Autoconf 2.50 on 19/20 May 2001?

If anyone present can show just and legal cause why it may not be shipped, let them speak now or forever hold their peace.

Re: 2.49e problems with gcc

(partly stolen from AC_CHECK_DECLS) but this requires cvs autoconf, I believe. Yes, it does. And if you require 2.50, then just use AC_CHECK_DECLS :) Is there a good way to say this in 2.13-speak, so I can suggest a patch to the gcc maintainers? Sorry,

Re: AC_EXEEXT

> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ralf> BTW: This example triggers further problems in automake's and Ralf> autoconf's interaction wrt. handling ASM-code. AFAIS, Ralf> CVS/automake currently generates bogus code for ASM; autoconf Ralf> probably might need an AC_PROG_AS-ma

Re: AC_EXEEXT

> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ralf> Until now this package's configure.in has been using AC_EXEEXT Ralf> alone (w/o AC_PROG_CC), now I seem to need adding AC_PROG_CC, Ralf> but .. Undesired side effect. It seems so weird to need EXEEXT but no compiler... Ralf> A