Re: autoconf complains wrongly about version of m4

2001-05-17 Thread Matt Schalit
David Kirkby wrote: > > Hi, > I use automake and autoconf at home on my Sun SPARCstation with no > problems. > > However, I'm now trying to use autoconf 2.13 at work on an HP-UX system, > with little success. Sorry I can't reproduce the exact error message > (I'm not on the machine), but

Re: Autoconf and cross-compiling

2001-05-17 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 17, 2001, Guido Draheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > like a list which autoconf-tests are good for cross-compiling > and which are not, or just in some places. autoconf will already warn about tests that aren't good for cross-compiling. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://ww

Re: Autoconf and cross-compiling

2001-05-17 Thread Ralf Corsepius
"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > On Thursday 17 May 2001 7:30 pm, Guido Draheim wrote: > > "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > > On Wednesday 16 May 2001 9:27 pm, David Burg wrote: > > > > Are they some easy understandable cross-compiling with autoconf how-to > > > > avaible somewhere ? > > > > > > Chapte

Re: Autoconf and cross-compiling

2001-05-17 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Thursday 17 May 2001 7:30 pm, Guido Draheim wrote: > "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > On Wednesday 16 May 2001 9:27 pm, David Burg wrote: > > > Are they some easy understandable cross-compiling with autoconf how-to > > > avaible somewhere ? > > > > Chapter 25 of the Goat book, http://wources.redh

autoconf complains wrongly about version of m4

2001-05-17 Thread David Kirkby
Hi, I use automake and autoconf at home on my Sun SPARCstation with no problems. However, I'm now trying to use autoconf 2.13 at work on an HP-UX system, with little success. Sorry I can't reproduce the exact error message (I'm not on the machine), but autoconf complains that it needs gn

Re: Autoconf and cross-compiling

2001-05-17 Thread Guido Draheim
"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > On Wednesday 16 May 2001 9:27 pm, David Burg wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I need to change a existent configure.in file to enable cross-compiling > > (host is x86 and target is strongarm). I have read the on-line documention > > of autoconf on www.gnu.org, but explainat

Re: Autoconf and cross-compiling

2001-05-17 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Wednesday 16 May 2001 9:27 pm, David Burg wrote: > Hello, > > I need to change a existent configure.in file to enable cross-compiling > (host is x86 and target is strongarm). I have read the on-line documention > of autoconf on www.gnu.org, but explainations on cross-compiling > configuration

RE: 2.49e problems with gcc

2001-05-17 Thread Tim Van Holder
> | Nice patch, but I don't think it works. I'd be surprised if you > | actually have the #undef templates in config.h.in since you pass an sh > | var, which is opaque to autoheader. You need `static' values for > | autoheader. That's why they had the last chunk. > | > | Use > | > | -if test x

RE: AC_EXEEXT

2001-05-17 Thread Tim Van Holder
> > > Until now this package's configure.in has been using AC_EXEEXT alone > > > (w/o AC_PROG_CC), now I seem to need adding AC_PROG_CC, but .. > > > .. Adding AC_CANONICAL_HOST would give sense, but this also > > > apparently isn't sufficient. > > > > This does seem like the right thing to do th

Re: AC_EXEEXT

2001-05-17 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Tim Van Holder wrote: > > On 16 May 2001 00:22:43 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > Until now this package's configure.in has been using AC_EXEEXT alone > > (w/o AC_PROG_CC), now I seem to need adding AC_PROG_CC, but .. > > .. Adding AC_CANONICAL_HOST would give sense, but this also > > apparen