Hi,
autoconf.texi says that the third argument of AC_TRY_RUN (action-if-false)
can use $?. This is untrue; $? gets smashed by echo and cat. autoconf 2.49d
seems to introduce $ac_status to hold the pre-smashed value of $?. It'd
be nice if the documentation could get fixed to reflect this befo
On Apr 12, 2001, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> auxiliary:
> Sounds perfect... ;-)
Indeed. Its only problem is that people end up naming the directory
`aux', which doesn't work on DOS.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Develo
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 11:21:03PM -0400, Steven G. Johnson wrote:
> This macro is documented in the manual but I can't seem to find it in the
> source. Is it obsolete?
Well spotted! It's now AC_LIBSOURCES([foo.c, bar.c]).
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 09:41:00PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
: 2. Subsidiary; supplementary.
Hey, I like sub for "subsidiary".
sub - subsidiary scripts
sub-scripts / subroutines for the build system
subdir for Autoconf stuff :)
Lars J
Vaclav Barta writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Vaclav Barta writes:
> > > I can define YFLAGS = -d in my Makefile.am and it will work on
> > > my machine. What I'd like to ask, is, of course: is this the
> > > right, autoconf-sanctioned, portable thing to do? And even
> > > better - would it
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Vaclav Barta writes:
> > I can define YFLAGS = -d in my Makefile.am and it will work on
> > my machine. What I'd like to ask, is, of course: is this the
> > right, autoconf-sanctioned, portable thing to do? And even
> > better - would it be possible to fix autoconf to han
