Hello, Vaidhyanathan!
> Due to glibc 2.2, the standard headers will no longer be included by default..
> So config.guess needs to add
>
> #include
>
> after line 696..
First of all, all fixes to config.guess and config.sub should be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Secondly, I don't know what version
Hi Pavel,
Found out that my config.guess is at least a six months old.. The newer
ones have fixed it..
The problem was that with the new g++, stdio.h will not be included by default..
It needs to be included explictly to provide printf function prototype..
I got the latest one and the bug has
Hi,
Due to glibc 2.2, the standard headers will no longer be included by default..
So config.guess needs to add
#include
after line 696..
I am not sure if this change is needed for other platforms..
Regards,
Vaidhy
PGP signature
> On DJGPP, can't you find some other tool that would help? For
> instance, is perl necessarily installed? Can we use it?
No, it's not. And the DJGPP maintainers get very upset if you
try forcing users to have too many non-trivial packages
installed (and perl is certainly non-trivial).
I can't t
Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Feb 3, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > The question is `is $FILE an executable in the common sense'.
> >
> > I think the best thing to do is to just ignore the issue of whether
> > the found e
"Tim Van Holder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First off, sorry for the delay in replying; I just set up a new PC and
> there is still much migrating and configuring to do...
>
> > But I never read explicitly your environment also has this problem.
> > Has it, or has it not? Because we can
> it
Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Feb 3, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The question is `is $FILE an executable in the common sense'.
>
> I think the best thing to do is to just ignore the issue of whether
> the found executable is a directory while testing
> This is for 2.51 or more. We do have a problem with AC_CHECK_PROG and
> relatives, that's for sure. But let's forget about this issue now.
> Please, install your proposals etc. in TODO, but focus on releasing
> Autoconf.
Ok. I like this approach.
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
This is for 2.51 or more. We do have a problem with AC_CHECK_PROG and
relatives, that's for sure. But let's forget about this issue now.
Please, install your proposals etc. in TODO, but focus on releasing
Autoconf.
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:14:16AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
: This means, that
:
: AC_PROG_PERL([PERL PATH_PERL])
:
: will define PERL to "perl" and PATH_PERL to e.g. "/usr/bin/perl"
I'd prefer it if they were separate arguments and not just a list in
arg 1.
Lars J
Hello!
We have two types of macros for searching for programs - the first of them
always return path (AC_PATH_PROG), the other one doesn't normally add
path (AC_CHECK_PROG).
Sometimes we need both. For example, one may want to hardcode AWK with
full path into the first line of AWK scripts. On th
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, Akim!
>
> I'm very glad that you are back!
Hi Pavel,
I'm happy to be here again :)
> The idea was that some macros take some test on input. There are some
> constraints on that text. It's better if m4 checks for them rather than
> the shell,
Grrr, se have a problem with GNU sed which uses a definition for \b
which is not what I thought it was. Or maybe it's a recent update of
my libc which is responsible.
Still, I think rewriting autoupdate in Perl will happen sooner than I
thought. The problem we have (there is a failure in the t
Hello, Akim!
I'm very glad that you are back!
> > I tried to put some sanity checks to AT_DATA, but finally decided that
> > they are not worth the trouble.
> >
> > However, this macro (m4_unquote) appeared in process and can be useful for
> > somebody. It was hard for me to write it (but it was
I finally applied this.
Index: BUGS
===
RCS file: /cvs/autoconf/BUGS,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -u -r1.9 BUGS
--- BUGS 2001/02/05 17:33:00 1.9
+++ BUGS 2001/02/19 15:08:11
@@ -21,14 +21,6 @@
* Serious Problems
-** Broken
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, Derek!
>
> On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Derek R. Price wrote:
>
> > Why do the AC_CANONICAL_* functions no longer set *_alias? There's a
>
> "cvs annotate" and "cvs log" are your friends. Akim did it. But the log
> message is silent about "FIXME". Akim
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, Alexandre!
>
> > [[AC_INIT([foo])
> > AC_MSG_ERROR([bad \"value\" found])
> > AC_OUTPUT([Makefile])
> > ]])
> >
> > it took me a while to figure that when I submitted the
> > AC_CACHE_CHECK test (in my case the resulting testsuite
> > was just sy
Paul Martinolich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The autoscan from autoconf-2.49c has ugly output for the
> missing macro warning.
>
> $ ../../devel/bin/autoscan.orig
> warning: missing AC_TYPE_PID_T wanted by:
>libsdptk/src/PGS_IO_Gen_Temp_Reference.c:675 libsdptk/src/PGS_SMF_Comp.c:5336
>libsd
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello!
>
> It arrepars that the problem that I originally attributed to the "-Wall"
> processing has to do with the way how AC_OUTPUT is defined. I expected a
> message about AC_OUTPUT with arguments, and was surprised not to see it.
>
> acgeneral.m4 d
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> >>> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
> Pavel> # m4_unquote(STRING)
> Pavel> # --
> Pavel> # Remove one pair of the quotes if they exist
> [...]
>
> This just recall me of a place where I
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello!
>
> I tried to put some sanity checks to AT_DATA, but finally decided that
> they are not worth the trouble.
>
> However, this macro (m4_unquote) appeared in process and can be useful for
> somebody. It was hard for me to write it (but it was a
"Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sh, S
> It's, oh, so quiet
> It's, oh, so still
> You're all alone
> And so peaceful until...
>
> [lyrics by Bjork, of course]
>
> So, when's Akim back?
:) :) :)
Hi people, I'm back. Broke no legs, although some skier was probably
paid to
22 matches
Mail list logo
