Hello, Autoconf,
Browsing the CVS development tree at
http://subversions.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/autoconf/config.guess
I see:
*:OS/390:*:*)
echo i370-ibm-openedition
exit 0 ;;
Of course I'm pleased to see that OS/390 is being recognized in a
future autoconf. However, I see
Hey everyone, I'll fess up as the user Mo was referring to - but he
missed a few key points... like this is happening on RedHat 6.2 not
AIX. Here's the actual sequence of failures:
[jikes@tweedle jikes]$ echo $PATH
/opt/autoconf/bin:/opt/automake/bin:/opt/tcltk/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/u
I just did a CVS update and I am now getting this warning
while running autoconf. ( last updated around 2000-07-06)
% ./autogen.sh
autoheader: src/config.h.in is unchanged
configure.in:23: warning: AC_CANONICAL_BUILD invoked multiple times
(line 23)
dnl Set up host checks using config.sub an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Johan Danielsson) writes:
> This doesn't work with newer autoconf since it explicitly checks for
> ` and $.
Isn't this infact a bug?
AC_INIT(configure.in)
AC_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h)
zz=X
AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED($zz, 1, test)
produces an empty config.h.in
/Johan
In 2.13 you could do stuff like:
AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(`echo FOO`, 1, whatever)
This doesn't work with newer autoconf since it explicitly checks for `
and $. So how should this be done?
/Johan
What is the preferred method of submitting changes to autoconf ? A friend
has made some changes for me and I would like to submit them for inclusion
in the upcoming autoconf release. However, I want to make sure they
are submitted in the proper fashion, so that they are not rejected as
being in