[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9744 for your review

2025-03-15 Thread je_drake--- via auth48archive
Sarah, Would you please also change my affiliation to ‘Independent’? Thanks, John Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 10, 2025, at 12:35 PM, je_dr...@yahoo.com wrote: > > Thanks! > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 10, 2025, at 12:14 PM, Sarah Tarrant >> wrote: >> >> Hi John, >> >> We have u

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9744 for your review

2025-03-10 Thread je_drake--- via auth48archive
Thanks! Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 10, 2025, at 4:06 PM, Sarah Tarrant > wrote: > > Hi James and John, > > We have updated your email addresses and affiliations accordingly. > > Thank you, > RFC Editor/st > >> On Mar 10, 2025, at 2:47 PM, je_dr...@yahoo.com wrote: >> >> Sarah, >> >> Wo

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9744 for your review

2025-03-11 Thread je_drake--- via auth48archive
Sarah, Please update my email address in the RFC to be. Thanks, John Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 10, 2025, at 9:34 AM, Sarah Tarrant > wrote: > > Hi John and Patrice, > > Thank you for your replies. We have marked your approval on the AUTH48 status > page for this document (see https://

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9744 for your review

2025-03-11 Thread je_drake--- via auth48archive
I agree, the RFC editor staff, and Sarah in particular, have done a wonderful job. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 11, 2025, at 3:30 PM, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) wrote: > >  > Thank you Sarah for all your work and edits during this Auth48 process. > > Regards, > Ali > > From: Sarah Tarrant > D

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9744 for your review

2025-03-13 Thread je_drake--- via auth48archive
Thanks! Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 10, 2025, at 12:14 PM, Sarah Tarrant > wrote: > > Hi John, > > We have updated your email address accordingly. > > We will await approvals from each of the parties listed at the AUTH48 status > page prior to moving this document forward in the publicati