[auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9711 for your review

2025-04-09 Thread Laurence Lundblade via auth48archive
Here is a PR for a better fix for section 6.3.6: https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/eat/pull/474 It’s a different use of NULL than section 4.2.10, so a different fix is needed. Thanks! LL > On Apr 6, 2025, at 12:37 PM, Karen Moore wrote: > > Dear Laurence and Carsten, > > Thank you for your r

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9711 for your review

2025-04-21 Thread Laurence Lundblade via auth48archive
Hi Karen, I went through and checked all 19 instances (7 I asked for, plus 12 you found). They all look good. Thank you for taking the initiative and fixing them all to make the document consistent! LL > On Apr 18, 2025, at 4:56 PM, Karen Moore wrote: > > Hello Laurence, > > We believe th

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9782 for your review

2025-05-07 Thread Laurence Lundblade via auth48archive
I approve. LL > On May 7, 2025, at 12:45 PM, Madison Church > wrote: > > Hi Henk, > > Thank you for your response! We have noted your approval here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9782. > > Once we receive approval from Lawrence, we will move this document forward in > the publica