[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9767 for your review

2025-04-14 Thread Fabien Imbault via auth48archive
Sure. I'll keep you posted. Best Fabien On Mon, 14 Apr 2025, 23:59 Justin Richer, wrote: > OK, I think the best bet is to keep the acert.io address on the > specification but make sure your gmail account is CC’d on the discussion, > what do you think? > > I’m reviewing the final diffs now, Fabie

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9767 for your review

2025-04-14 Thread Fabien Imbault via auth48archive
Well actually there is an issue with the payment for some obscure reason. My sincere apologies, the easiest will be to change for a free account that I'm sure will never have that sort of issue. Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help further. Best Fabien On Mon, 14 Apr 2025, 23:

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9767 for your review

2025-04-16 Thread Fabien Imbault via auth48archive
Hi Karen, hi Justin, That's good, thanks a lot. Best regards Fabien On Wed, 16 Apr 2025, 22:01 Karen Moore, wrote: > Hi Justin, > > We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page for this document ( > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9767). We now await Fabien’s > approval prior to

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9767 for your review

2025-04-15 Thread Fabien Imbault via auth48archive
Hi there, I have no idea, my email account is perfectly fine and I do receive ietf notifications. Yet if that's really an issue you may use fabien.imba...@gmail.com if needed. Best regards Fabien On Mon, 14 Apr 2025, 21:06 Justin Richer, wrote: > Hi Karen, > > This happened recently with RFC963

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9767 for your review

2025-04-18 Thread Fabien Imbault via auth48archive
Hi Karen, I have indeed reviewed the document and it looks good. Hopefully I'll implement it soon (btw Justin, now gnap is in testing at ssi.gouv.fr ;-)) Cheers Fabien On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, 21:55 Karen Moore, wrote: > Hi Fabien, > > Per your response, we believe you are currently reviewing the