[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9760 for your review

2025-03-28 Thread Doug Arnold via auth48archive
RFC editor, Thanks for finding lots of nits. Here are answers from the authors to your questions, 1) single initial is fine for us 2) confirm that we do not need to change the document 3) The relevant part in [Estrela_and_Bonebakker] is this: " Unfortunately, this option is not scalable, becaus

[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9760 for your review

2025-04-03 Thread Doug Arnold via auth48archive
Hello Lynne, Here are answers to your questions: 1. The "ISPCS" in this reference was a cut and paste error. The reference is intended to be [RFC2026]. This reference was added at the request of one of the reviewers. I do not have any objection to removing the reference and entire sente